Foley & Lardner
Foley & Lardner LLP is an international law firm started in 1842. According to The American Lawyer, the firm ranked 35th on The American Lawyer's 2009 AmLaw 100 rankings of U.S. law firms, with $731,000,000 in gross revenue in 2008. Foley & Lardner has been in The American Lawyer's annual AmLaw 100 rankings of U.S. law firms by revenue since 1986.
Source: Wikipedia
Campaign Finance
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
For more information, please see our campaign finance methodology page. Lobbyist bundling data is described on our lobbyist bundling methodology page.
Latest FEC Data
covers through committee's October 17, 2012 filing.-
Summary
overview of the committee's finances- Total Raised:
- $129,776
- Total Spent:
- $77,588
- Cash on Hand:
- $96,156
- Debts:
- $0
Standardized Donation Information
covers through June 2012. may lag behind FEC section above, as donors and industries are identified by hand.-
Top Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
-
Republicans vs. Democrats
in dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation. -
State vs. Federal
in dollars -
Top PAC Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
Lobbying
$2,190,000 IncomeFigures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying Carried Out by Foley & Lardner
-
Names of Lobbyists
-
Client Amount National Concrete Masonry Assn $290,000 Shoreland Inc $180,000 Canadian National Railway $180,000 Emcare Inc $180,000 Hanger Orthopedic Group $180,000 Integrys Energy Group $150,000 Great Lakes Higher Education Corp $150,000 TDS Telecommunications $120,000 Sub-Zero Freezer Co $110,000 Sittercity $90,000 -
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Defense,
- Health Issues,
- Energy & Nuclear Power,
- Fed Budget & Appropriations,
- Taxes,
- Environment & Superfund,
- Labor, Antitrust & Workplace,
- Medical Research & Clin Labs,
- Telecommunications,
- Homeland Security
-
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title H.R.3395 Concrete Masonry Products Research, Education, and Promotion Act of 2011 H.R.4123 Fair Playing Field Act of 2012 S.2145 Fair Playing Field Act of 2012 S.2252 Rebuild America Act H.R.2575 Prosthetic and Custom Orthotic Parity Act of 2009 S.3223 Prosthetics and Custom Orthotics Parity Act of 2010 S.3517 Claims Processing Improvement Act of 2010 S.3786 Fair Playing Field Act of 2010 H.R.6128 Fair Playing Field Act of 2010 -
Recent Lobbying Contracts
Date Client Summary Oct. 18, 2012 GliaCure, Inc. Assisting GliaCure in exploring partnership and funding opportunities. View registration Oct. 18, 2012 Campbell-Ewald Co. Oversight of U.S. Postal Service contracting activities. View registration Oct. 18, 2012 Aurora Health Care Issues related to healthcare, Medicare reimbursement, and implementation of the Affordable Care Act. View registration Aug. 29, 2012 Sigue Corporation Issues related to money transfer companies View registration
Regulations
7 MentionsAll data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Foley & Lardner" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
-
Mentions in Document Text
Advisory Committees
1 person on 1 committeeData is based on disclosures required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Matches are based on the occurrence of the company name in the committee member affiliation. Variations in company names may cause some matches to be missed.
The table shows only the top 10 agencies. To search and download raw records from the complete dataset see the FACA data section.
Table shows employees of "Foley & Lardner" that sat on federal advisory committees.
View all advisory committee data for Foley & Lardner