Shaw Group
The Shaw Group is a Fortune 500 corporation headquartered in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. As of February 27, 2011, the company employed approximately 28,000 people all over the world with 7 billion dollar revenue in 2010. Its core competencies are Engineering, Procurement, and Construction, piping, energy, chemical, and fossil and nuclear power.
Source: Wikipedia
Campaign Finance
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
For more information, please see our campaign finance methodology page. Lobbyist bundling data is described on our lobbyist bundling methodology page.
Latest FEC Data
covers through committee's October 17, 2012 filing.-
Summary
overview of the committee's finances- Total Raised:
- $275,427
- Total Spent:
- $299,218
- Cash on Hand:
- $15,990
- Debts:
- $0
Standardized Donation Information
covers through June 2012. may lag behind FEC section above, as donors and industries are identified by hand.-
Top Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
-
Republicans vs. Democrats
in dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation. -
State vs. Federal
in dollars -
Top PAC Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
Lobbying
$2,235,000 SpentFigures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying On Behalf of Shaw Group
-
Names of Lobbyists
-
Firm Hired Amount Patton Boggs LLP $480,000 Miller & Chevalier $170,000 Fox Potomac Resources $160,000 Williams & Jensen $100,000 KSCW Inc $100,000 Mathis Group $60,000 K&L Gates $50,000 -
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Energy & Nuclear Power,
- Taxes,
- Defense,
- Fed Budget & Appropriations,
- Disaster & Emergency Planning,
- Trade,
- Government Issues
-
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title H.R.2354 Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012 H.R.1280 To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to require congressional approval of agreements for peaceful nuclear cooperation with foreign countries, and for other purposes. H.R.1540 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 S.1253 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 H.R.3096 Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States Act of 2011 H.R.3366 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that bonus depreciation is not a cost allocated to a contract under the percentage of completion method for long-term contracts. S.1400 Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States Act of 2011 S.1873 Bonus Depreciation and Small Business Expense Extension Act H.R.2055 Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012 H.R.3630 Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2011
Regulations
3 MentionsAll data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Shaw Group" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
-
Mentions in Document Text
Contractor Misconduct
1 InstancesThis information is collected by the Project On Government Oversight from press releases, court documents, news reports and other public records. It is not meant to be an exhaustive account of all instances of federal contractor misconduct.
More information on each instance, including primary source documents, is available on POGO's site by clicking on the instance description. More information on POGO's methodology is available here.
| Misconduct Type | Hired By | Incident | Year | Disposition | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government Contract Fraud | State/Local | Weiser, et al. v. Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure | 2011 | Pending | $0 |
