Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) is a United States aerospace, defense, security, and advanced technology company with worldwide interests. It was formed by the merger of Lockheed Corporation with Martin Marietta in March 1995. It is headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington Metropolitan Area. Lockheed Martin employs 133,000 people worldwide. Robert J. Stevens is the current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Campaign Finance$26,977,144 Given
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
- PAC Color Block
- Organization's PAC(s)
- Employee Color Block
- Associated Individuals
Republicans vs. Democratsin dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation.
State vs. Federalin dollars
Top PAC Recipients
- PAC Color Block
- Organization's PAC(s)
- Employee Color Block
- Associated Individuals
Bundled ContributionsMoney raised by the firm from multiple donors on behalf of the recipient. The firm's own contributions are not included.
Recipient Lobbyist Amount Howard P. Mckeon Larry Duncan $59,000 Charles E. Schumer Larry Duncan $51,540 Daniel K. Inouye Larry Duncan $42,000 Ben Nelson Larry Duncan $21,000
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of Lockheed Martin
Names of Lobbyists
Firm Hired Amount Lockheed Martin $159,400,880 Comsat Corp $3,280,000 Fleishman-Hillard Inc $220,000
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Fed Budget & Appropriations,
- Aviation, Airlines & Airports,
- Homeland Security,
- Science & Technology,
- Energy & Nuclear Power,
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title H.R.2638 Border Infrastructure and Technology Modernizat H.R.4310 Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 H.R.1585 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 H.R.2219 Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2012 H.R.5658 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 S.3001 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 H.R.3222 Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2008 H.R.5122 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 H.R.1540 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 H.R.5631 Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2007
RegulationsMentioned in 1384 dockets; Submitted to 42 dockets
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Lockheed Martin" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
Documents Submitted by the Organization
View all submissions data for Lockheed Martin
- Toggle 4 FAA Licensing and Safety Requirements for Launch 2000
- Toggle 2 FAA Exemption/Rulemaking - Lockheed Martin 2002
- Toggle 2 USCG Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002 2003
- Toggle 2 FAA 2009-NM-015-AD Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, 382G Airplanes 2009
- Toggle 2 FAA Exemption/Rulemaking - Lockheed Martin Aircraft Center (LMAC) 2002
- Toggle 2 OSHA Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2013
- Toggle 2 LMSO Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act; Interpretation of the "Advice" Exemption 2011
- Toggle 1 BIS Revisions to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR): Control of Aircraft and Related Items the President Determines No Longer Warrant Control Under the United States Munitions List (USML). 2011
- Toggle 1 OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION 2006
- Toggle 1 BIS Proposed Revisions to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR): Control of Spacecraft Systems and Related Items the President Determines No Longer Warrant Control Under the United States Munitions List (USML) 2013
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for Lockheed Martin
- Toggle 46 DOT Special Rules for Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (Within-Perimeter Exemptions, i.e., Service to Another Airport 1,250 Miles Away or Less From Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport) 2000
- Toggle 32 FAA Licensing and Safety Requirements for Launch 2000
- Toggle 29 SBA Small Business Size Standards: Professional, Scientific and Technical Services 2011
- Toggle 26 PHMSA Space Systems/Loral - Exemption - Hazardous Materials - Transportation in Commerce of a Non-DOT Specification Pressure Vessel 2002
- Toggle 23 DOT 2007 U.S.-China Frequency Allocation Proceeding 2006
- Toggle 19 NSF Recently Posted NSF Rules and Notices. 2006
- Toggle 11 FAA 2011-NM-012-AD Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Model L‑1011 series airplanes 2012
- Toggle 11 EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks; Group I Polymers and Resins; Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations; Pharmaceuticals Production; The Printing and Publishing Industry; and Steel Pickling--HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants 2010
- Toggle 11 FAA 2009-NM-015-AD Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, 382G Airplanes 2009
- Toggle 10 FAA Exemption/Rulemaking - Lynden Air Cargo 2001
|2010||$4,800,000||US Air Force/Air National Guard (Hatch) Lockheed Martin: Senior Scout, Electro-Optical Infrared Capability|
|2010||$4,000,000||Lockheed Martin: Javelin Warhead Improvement Program|
Marine Air-Ground Task Force Situational Awareness
|2010||$2,400,000||Lockheed Martin US Air Force/Air National Guard (Hatch): Senior Scout, Remote Operations Capability|
|2010||$2,400,000||Lockheed Martin US Air Force/Air National Guard (Hatch): Senior Scout, Line of Sight Datalink|
Squad Mission Support System (SMSS)
|2008||$1,280,000||Lockheed Martin: Tomahawk and Tomahawk Mission Planning Center (TMPC) -- Tomahawk Weapons Control System|
|2008||$1,000,000||Lockheed Martin: C-130 -- Senior Scout Integrated Mission Trainer|
Federal Spending28 grants; 18,026 contracts
Federal grants, contracts and loans are reported by federal agencies using the FPDS and FAADS systems. The data is made available to the public at USASpending.gov. Please note that the completeness and quality of the data varies greatly by agency.
Only grants, contracts and loans with amounts over $1 million are shown.
Because company names are not reported in a standardized manner, we cannot reliably determine the company receiving the contract or award. The results shown here are based on a search for the company name. Individual records may be missed or erroneously included because of name variations. For more information, please see our federal spending methodology page.
Note: Company names in federal spending data are not standardized. The table below is included only as a sample of what is available in the data and has not been reviewed for accuracy or completeness. To investigate the data further, use the links at the bottom of the table.
|Lockheed Martin Corporation||2011||THIS MODIFICATION DEFNITIZES THE PRODUCTION CLINS UNDER THE LRIP 4 AAC AND MAKES NETHERLANDS PRODUCTION CLINS OPTIONS.||$3,485,385,767|
|Lockheed Martin Corporation||2004||$2,000,000,000|
|Lockheed Martin Corporation||2009||DEFINITIZATION OF PRODUCTION REQUIREMENT||$1,997,883,920|
|Lockheed Martin Corporation||2006||$1,888,258,226|
|Lockheed Martin Corporation||2004||$1,887,415,673|
|Lockheed Martin Corporation||2013||LRIP 6 UCA AWARD FOR U.S. ONLY REQUIREMENTS.||$1,838,590,664|
|Lockheed Martin Corporation||2002||$1,821,678,567|
|Lockheed Martin Corporation||2007||$1,800,000,000|
|Lockheed Martin Corporation||2009||MODIFICATION TO ADD FY09 FUNDING TO MULTI-YEAR||$1,773,547,967|
|Lockheed Martin Corporation||2003||$1,746,285,512|
Contractor Misconduct67 Instances
This information is collected by the Project On Government Oversight from press releases, court documents, news reports and other public records. It is not meant to be an exhaustive account of all instances of federal contractor misconduct.
More information on each instance, including primary source documents, is available on POGO's site by clicking on the instance description. More information on POGO's methodology is available here.
|Misconduct Type||Hired By||Incident||Year||Disposition||Penalty|
|Cost/Labor Mischarge||Defense - General||Self-Reported F-35 Overbilling||2007||Restitution||$265,000,000|
|Environment||None||Groundwater Treatment (Burbank, CA)||1996||Settlement||$67,000,000|
|Poor Contract Performance||Energy||Contract Dispute (Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory)||2004||Judgment Against Defendant||$66,000,000|
|Government Contract Fraud||Defense - Air Force||Campbell v. Lockheed Martin (Jet Navigation Contracts)||2003||Settlement||$37,900,000|
|Import/Export||International||Aircraft Sale to Egypt (Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Violations)||1995||Pleaded Guilty||$24,800,200|
|Government Contract Fraud||Defense - Air Force||Becker v. Tools & Metals Inc. (Mischarging the Government)||2012||Settlement||$15,850,000|
|Import/Export||International||Space Launch Information Transfer to China (Arms Export Violation)||2000||Administrative Agreement||$13,000,000|
|Non-governmental Contract Fraud||Non-Governmental||Cable & Computer Technology v. Lockheed Martin (Unfair Business Practices)||2002||Judgment Against Defendant||$12,800,000|
|Government Contract Fraud||Defense - Air Force||Titan IV Rocket Billing Problems||2008||Settlement||$10,500,000|
|Defective Pricing||Transportation||Rent Overcharge||2001||Settlement||$10,500,000|
EPA Violations12 Enforcement Actions
Figures are based on data from the Environmental Protection Agency’s ECHO website. The ECHO database contains federal and state environmental enforcement actions. Data displayed here includes only those actions that began after 2000 and resulted in fines of over $1 million.
Actions where the company was the sole defendant are listed first. Actions where the company is one of multiple defendants are listed subsequently.
For more information see our EPA methodology page.
|Lockheed West Seattle Superfund Site||Lockheed Martin Corporation||2006||Seattle, Wa||$3,000,000|
|Harbor Island - Lockheed Shipyard Sediment Operable Unit||Lockheed Martin Corportaion||2006||Seattle, Wa||$1,500,000|
|Carolina Transformer Company||Lockheed Martin Corp. (+151 others)||2008||Fayetteville, Nc||$12,381,948|
|Omega Chemical Site||Lockheed Martin Electro-Optical Systems, Inc. (+101 others)||2005||Whittier, Ca||$10,147,354|
|Cooper Drum Superfund Site Uao For Rd/Ra||Lockheed-Martin Corporation (+42 others)||2009||South Gate, Ca||$9,066,848|
|San Gabriel Area 2 / Baldwin Park - Valspar||Lockheed Martin Corp. (+2 others)||2005||Azusa, Ca||$4,830,000|
|Green River Disposal, Inc. Superfund Site||Lockheed Martin (+30 others)||2008||Maceo, Ky||$3,520,000|
|Abb, Inc. Et Al (Spectron Deminimis Settlement)||Lockheed Martin (+547 others)||2003||Elkton, Md||$2,803,841|
|North Hollywood Operable Unit Aoc For Rd||Lockheed Martin Corporation (+1 others)||2011||N Hollywood, Ca||$2,200,000|
|Sfv (Area 2) Superfund Site, Glendale Chromium Ou Specified Work And Costs Aoc||Lockheed Martin Corporation (+3 others)||2011||Glendale, Ca||$1,900,000|
Advisory Committees220 people on 117 committees
Data is based on disclosures required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Matches are based on the occurrence of the company name in the committee member affiliation. Variations in company names may cause some matches to be missed.
The table shows only the top 10 agencies. To search and download raw records from the complete dataset see the FACA data section.
Table shows employees of "Lockheed Martin" that sat on federal advisory committees.
- Toggle Department of Transportation 103 people on 5 committees
- Toggle Department of Defense 36 people on 32 committees
- Toggle National Aeronautics and Space Administration 20 people on 18 committees
- Toggle National Science Foundation 26 people on 19 committees
- Toggle Department of Commerce 13 people on 13 committees
- Toggle Federal Communications Commission 8 people on 8 committees
- Toggle Department of State 12 people on 5 committees
- Toggle Department of Health and Human Services 4 people on 5 committees
- Toggle Department of Homeland Security 5 people on 3 committees
- Toggle Office of Science and Technology Policy 1 person on 2 committees