DLA Piper
DLA Piper is a global law firm with 69 offices across 30 countries and over 3,500 lawyers. It is one of the ten largest law firms in the world, with revenues of $2.25 billion in 2008/09. The firm is composed of two partnerships, DLA Piper International, and DLA Piper U.S. The two partnerships share a single management board but are not financially integrated.
Source: Wikipedia
Campaign Finance
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
For more information, please see our campaign finance methodology page. Lobbyist bundling data is described on our lobbyist bundling methodology page.
Latest FEC Data
covers through committee's October 17, 2012 filing.-
Summary
overview of the committee's finances- Total Raised:
- $1,030,301
- Total Spent:
- $953,414
- Cash on Hand:
- $131,988
- Debts:
- $0
Standardized Donation Information
covers through June 2012. may lag behind FEC section above, as donors and industries are identified by hand.-
Top Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
-
Republicans vs. Democrats
in dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation. -
State vs. Federal
in dollars -
Top PAC Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
-
Bundled Contributions
Money raised by the firm from multiple donors on behalf of the recipient. The firm's own contributions are not included.Recipient Lobbyist Amount Mitt Romney Ignacio E Sanchez $86,700 Mitt Romney Thomas M Boyd $26,350
Lobbying
$13,620,000 IncomeFigures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying Carried Out by DLA Piper
-
Names of Lobbyists
-
Client Amount Internet Commerce Coalition $790,000 Diageo North America $690,000 Raytheon Co $570,000 Natl Coalition on E-Commerce & Privacy $550,000 Globe Metallurgical $510,000 Renaissance Technologies $510,000 Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Admin $470,000 Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide $460,000 Qualcomm Inc $420,000 Maine Veterans Homes $390,000 -
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Taxes,
- Health Issues,
- Medicare & Medicaid,
- Trade,
- Finance,
- Defense,
- Fed Budget & Appropriations,
- Consumer Product Safety,
- Foreign Relations,
- Transportation
-
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title H.R.2577 SAFE Data Act S.1207 Data Security and Breach Notification Act of 2011 S.1535 Personal Data Protection and Breach Accountability Act of 2011 S.1660 American Jobs Act of 2011 S.1408 Data Breach Notification Act of 2011 S.968 PIPA H.R.891 Medication Therapy Management Benefits Act of 2011 S.274 Medication Therapy Management Empowerment Act of 2011 S.1151 Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2011 S.1490 Pregnancy Assistance Fund Expansion Act
Regulations
6 MentionsAll data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "DLA Piper" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
-
Mentions in Document Text