US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
Names of Lobbyists
Firm Hired Amount US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform $53,160,000
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Law Enforcement & Crime,
- Government Issues,
- Medicare & Medicaid,
- Health Issues,
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title S.987 Arbitration Fairness Act of 2011 H.R.1873 Arbitration Fairness Act of 2011 S.623 Sunshine in Litigation Act of 2011 H.R.966 Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 2011 H.R.592 Sunshine in Litigation Act of 2011 S.533 Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 2011 H.R.5 Help Efficient, Accessible, Low-cost, Timely Healthcare (HEALTH) Act of 2011 H.R.4369 Furthering Asbestos Claim Transparency (FACT) Act of 2012 H.R.906 Positive Reduction of Incarceration by Maximizing Education Act H.R.1237 To provide for a land exchange with the Trinity Public Utilities District of Trinity County, California, involving the transfer of land to the Bureau of Land Management and the Six Rivers National Forest in exchange for National Forest System land in the
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.