US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
Campaign Finance$4,250 Given
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
state-level data is not available in bulk for 2014. for current state data, browse http://followthemoney.org/
- PAC Color Block
- Organization's PAC(s)
- Employee Color Block
- Associated Individuals
Republicans vs. Democratsin dollars
State vs. Federalin dollars
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
Names of Lobbyists
Firm Hired Amount US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform $309,985,235
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Government Issues,
- Law Enforcement & Crime,
- Health Issues,
- Medicare & Medicaid,
- Consumer Product Safety,
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title S.987 Arbitration Fairness Act of 2011 H.R.1020 Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 S.1504 Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2009 H.R.1237 Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act of 2009 S.512 Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act H.R.991 Consumer Fairness Act of 2009 H.R.4115 Open Access to Courts Act of 2009 S.458 False Claims Act Clarification Act of 2009 H.R.1873 Arbitration Fairness Act of 2011
RegulationsMentioned in 5 dockets; Submitted to 2 dockets
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
Documents Submitted by the Organization
View all submissions data for US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
- Toggle 1 SEC Comments on Study on Extraterritorial Private Rights of Action 2010
- Toggle 1 SEC Comments on Proposed Rule: Incentive-Based Compensation Arrangements 2010
- Toggle 1 TREAS Review by the Treasury Department of the Regulatory Structure Associated with Financial Institutions 2007
- Toggle 1 HHSIG Requests for Information and Recommendations: Non-Binding Criteria for Implementing Permissive Exclusion Authority under the Social Security Act 2014
- Toggle 1 USC Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 2013