United Technologies

United Technologies Corporation (UTC) (NYSE: UTX) is an American multinational conglomerate headquartered in the United Technologies Building in Hartford, Connecticut. It researches, develops, and manufactures high-technology products in numerous areas, including aircraft engines, helicopters, HVAC, fuel cells, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others. UTC is also a large military contractor, producing missile systems and military helicopters, most notably the UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter. In 2005, it received over $5 billion in military contracts. Louis R. Chênevert is the current CEO.

Source: Wikipedia

Campaign Finance

Information

Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:

  • contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
  • only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
  • contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
  • corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
  • organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.

For more information, please see our campaign finance methodology page. Lobbyist bundling data is described on our lobbyist bundling methodology page.

Latest FEC Data

covers through committee's December 31, 2012 filing.
  • Summary

    overview of the committee's finances
    Total Raised:
    $1,594,769
    Total Spent:
    $1,624,550
    Cash on Hand:
    $230,317
    Debts:
    $0

Standardized Donation Information

covers roughly through Q4 2013. may lag behind FEC section above, as donors and industries are identified by hand.
  • Top Recipients

    PAC Color Block
    Organization's PAC(s)
    Employee Color Block
    Associated Individuals
    Includes contributions from the organization’s employees, their family members, and its political action committee.
  • Republicans vs. Democrats

    in dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation.
  • State vs. Federal

    in dollars
  • Top PAC Recipients

    PAC Color Block
    Organization's PAC(s)
    Employee Color Block
    Associated Individuals
    Includes contributions from the organization’s employees, their family members, and its political action committee.
View all campaign finance data for United Technologies Sources: OpenSecrets.org FollowTheMoney.org

Lobbying

$31,541,000 Spent
Information

Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.

For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.

covers roughly through Q4, 2013

Lobbying on Behalf of United Technologies

View all lobbying data for United Technologies Sources: Lobbyist Registration Tracker OpenSecrets.org

Regulations

Mentioned in 66 dockets; Submitted to 10 dockets
Information

All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.

Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.

Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.

Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.

updated daily from Regulations.gov by way of Docket Wrench

The tables show occurrences of "United Technologies" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.

Federal Spending

2 grants; 211 contracts
Information

Federal grants, contracts and loans are reported by federal agencies using the FPDS and FAADS systems. The data is made available to the public at USASpending.gov. Please note that the completeness and quality of the data varies greatly by agency.

Only grants, contracts and loans with amounts over $1 million are shown.

Because company names are not reported in a standardized manner, we cannot reliably determine the company receiving the contract or award. The results shown here are based on a search for the company name. Individual records may be missed or erroneously included because of name variations. For more information, please see our federal spending methodology page.

covers through USASpending.gov's Sept. 15, 2012 release for contracts and Oct. 19, 2012 for grants.

Note: Company names in federal spending data are not standardized. The table below is included only as a sample of what is available in the data and has not been reviewed for accuracy or completeness. To investigate the data further, use the links at the bottom of the table.

Type Recipient Name Year Agency Description Amount
contract
United Technologies Corporation 2011 CONTRACT DEFINITIZATION; 907,285,396 FUNDING INCREASE TO FULLY FUND CONTRACT. $910,155,145
contract
United Technologies Corporation 2012 LRIP 5 UCA $358,597,078
contract
United Technologies Corporation 2011 30 USAF SPARE F117-PW-100 ENGINES $272,552,404
contract
United Technologies Corporation 2011 INCREASE IN MAXIMUM QUANTITY OF F117-PW-100 ENGINES TO BE ORDERED FROM 208 TO 278 $225,602,077
contract
United Technologies Corporation 2012 LRIP 5 UNDEFINIFIED CONTRACT ACTION (UCA) VALUE IS INCREASED BY $9,557,346 AND FUNDING IS INCREASED BY $222,484,000 $222,484,000
contract
United Technologies Corporation 2012 LOT 6 ADVANCED ACQUISITION CONTRACT $194,097,296
contract
United Technologies Corp 2012 INCREMENTAL FUNDING (FY12 USN/USMC) $171,259,111
contract
United Technologies Corporation 2012 F117-PW-100 ENGINES FOR USAF $130,188,840
contract
United Technologies Corp 2012 INCREMENTAL FY11 US NAVY AND USAF FUNDING. ALSO CHANGES AF TABLE. $118,444,378
contract
United Technologies Corporation 2011 OPTION EXERCISE FOR AN INCREASE OF 8 TO THE INITIAL SPARE ENGINES UCA $100,738,400
View all grant & loan data for United Technologies View all contract data for United Technologies Sources: USASpending.gov

Contractor Misconduct

2 Instances
Information

This information is collected by the Project On Government Oversight from press releases, court documents, news reports and other public records. It is not meant to be an exhaustive account of all instances of federal contractor misconduct.

More information on each instance, including primary source documents, is available on POGO's site by clicking on the instance description. More information on POGO's methodology is available here.

covers through POGO's March 5, 2013 release
Misconduct Type Hired By Incident Year Disposition Penalty
Import/Export None Illegal Export of Military Software to China 2012 Pleaded Guilty $75,700,800
Defective Pricing Defense - Army Blackhawk Spare Parts Overcharging 2011 Investigative Finding $1,000,000
View all contractor misconduct data for United Technologies Sources: Federal Contractor Misconduct Database from POGO

EPA Violations

2 Enforcement Actions
Information

Figures are based on data from the Environmental Protection Agency’s ECHO website. The ECHO database contains federal and state environmental enforcement actions. Data displayed here includes only those actions that began after 2000 and resulted in fines of over $1 million.

Actions where the company was the sole defendant are listed first. Actions where the company is one of multiple defendants are listed subsequently.

For more information see our EPA methodology page.

covers through EPA's October 19, 2011 release
Case Name Defendant Date Locations Amount
Operating Industries Inc Superfund Site Admin Settlement No.2010-04 Carrier Corporation (+275 others) 2011 Monterey Park, Ca $8,500,000
Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. Et Al. United Technologies Corporation (+4 others) 2011 Tusten, Ny $8,100,000
View all EPA violations data for United Technologies Sources: EPA ECHO Enforcement Data

Advisory Committees

7 people on 3 committees
Information

Data is based on disclosures required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Matches are based on the occurrence of the company name in the committee member affiliation. Variations in company names may cause some matches to be missed.

The table shows only the top 10 agencies. To search and download raw records from the complete dataset see the FACA data section.

covers through 2011

Table shows employees of "United Technologies" that sat on federal advisory committees.

  • Agency
  • Representation
  • Toggle National Science Foundation 6 people on 2 committees
  • Toggle Department of Energy 1 person on 1 committee
View all advisory committee data for United Technologies