United Technologies Corporation (UTC) (NYSE: UTX) is an American multinational conglomerate headquartered in the United Technologies Building in Hartford, Connecticut. It researches, develops, and manufactures high-technology products in numerous areas, including aircraft engines, helicopters, HVAC, fuel cells, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others. UTC is also a large military contractor, producing missile systems and military helicopters, most notably the UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter. In 2005, it received over $5 billion in military contracts. Louis R. Chênevert is the current CEO.

Source: Wikipedia

Campaign Finance

$12,501,390 Given

Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:

  • contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
  • only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
  • contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
  • corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
  • organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.

For more information, please see our campaign finance methodology page. Lobbyist bundling data is described on our lobbyist bundling methodology page.

federal data covers from 1989 roughly through Q2 2014
state-level data is not available in bulk for 2014. for current state data, browse http://followthemoney.org/
  • Top Recipients

    PAC Color Block
    Organization's PAC(s)
    Employee Color Block
    Associated Individuals
    Includes contributions from the organization’s employees, their family members, and its political action committee.
  • Republicans vs. Democrats

    in dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation.
  • State vs. Federal

    in dollars
  • Top PAC Recipients

    PAC Color Block
    Organization's PAC(s)
    Employee Color Block
    Associated Individuals
    Includes contributions from the organization’s employees, their family members, and its political action committee.
  • Bundled Contributions

    Money raised by the firm from multiple donors on behalf of the recipient. The firm's own contributions are not included.
    Recipient Lobbyist Amount
    John B. Larson   $75,075
View all campaign finance data for United Technologies Sources: OpenSecrets.org FollowTheMoney.org


$129,417,633 Spent

Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.

For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.

covers roughly through Q2, 2014

Lobbying on Behalf of United Technologies

View all lobbying data for United Technologies Sources: Lobbyist Registration Tracker OpenSecrets.org


Mentioned in 793 dockets; Submitted to 57 dockets

All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.

Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.

Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.

Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.

updated daily from Regulations.gov by way of Docket Wrench

The tables show occurrences of "United Technologies" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.


$4,000,000 Received

Figures are based on both committee earmark disclosures and on analysis of appropriations bill text. Table shows top 10 earmarks, ordered by dollar amount in the final version of the bill.

For more information, see our Earmark Methodology page.

Top Earmarks

Fiscal Year Amount Description
2010 $4,000,000 United Technologies, United Technologies Corporation--Pratt Whitney (Dodd, Lieberman), Honeywell Aerospace (Pastor), and Pratt and Whitney (DeLauro, Larson): Advanced Affordable Turbine Engine Program
View all earmarks data for United Technologies

Federal Spending

24 grants; 1,287 contracts

Federal grants, contracts and loans are reported by federal agencies using the FPDS and FAADS systems. The data is made available to the public at USASpending.gov. Please note that the completeness and quality of the data varies greatly by agency.

Only grants, contracts and loans with amounts over $1 million are shown.

Because company names are not reported in a standardized manner, we cannot reliably determine the company receiving the contract or award. The results shown here are based on a search for the company name. Individual records may be missed or erroneously included because of name variations. For more information, please see our federal spending methodology page.

covers through USASpending.gov's Sept. 15, 2012 release for contracts and Oct. 19, 2012 for grants.

Note: Company names in federal spending data are not standardized. The table below is included only as a sample of what is available in the data and has not been reviewed for accuracy or completeness. To investigate the data further, use the links at the bottom of the table.

Type Recipient Name Year Agency Description Amount
United Technologies Corporation 2011 CONTRACT DEFINITIZATION; 907,285,396 FUNDING INCREASE TO FULLY FUND CONTRACT. $910,155,145
United Technologies Corp 2006 $669,197,122
United Technologies Corporation 2009 LRIP 3 DEFINITIZATION $571,114,320
United Technologies Corp 2003 $450,000,000
United Technologies Corp 2005 $442,786,718
United Technologies Corp 2004 $426,150,000
United Technologies Corp 2002 $406,721,347
United Technologies Corp 2007 $400,000,000
United Technologies Corp 2009 INCREMENTAL FUNDING FY09 NAVY AND FY09 AF FUNDS $400,000,000
United Technologies Corporation 2013 F117-PW-100 ENGINE BUY FOR INDIA (36) SPARES&(5) INSTALLS $375,952,493
View all grant & loan data for United Technologies View all contract data for United Technologies Sources: USASpending.gov

Contractor Misconduct

18 Instances

This information is collected by the Project On Government Oversight from press releases, court documents, news reports and other public records. It is not meant to be an exhaustive account of all instances of federal contractor misconduct.

More information on each instance, including primary source documents, is available on POGO's site by clicking on the instance description. More information on POGO's methodology is available here.

covers through POGO's March 5, 2013 release
Misconduct Type Hired By Incident Year Disposition Penalty
Antitrust None Price Fixing 2007 Fine $295,000,000
Import/Export None Illegal Export of Military Software to China 2012 Pleaded Guilty $75,700,800
Government Contract Fraud Defense - Air Force Defective F-15 and F-16 Engine Turbine Blade Replacements 2008 Settlement $50,325,000
Government Contract Fraud Defense - General United States v. United Technologies (Preparing False Purchase Orders and Submitting False Invoices) 1997 Settlement $14,800,000
Environment None Clean Water Act Violations (2007) 2007 Pleaded Guilty $12,000,000
Government Contract Fraud Defense - Air Force Submitting False Invoices on Jet Engine Contract 2008 Judgment Against Defendant $7,090,000
Environment None CERCLA Cleanup of Memphis Site 2009 Settlement $3,207,936
Government Contract Fraud NASA NASA Contract False Claims 2010 Settlement $2,988,819
Government Contract Fraud Defense - Army Black Hawk False Claims Settlement 2009 Settlement $2,941,000
Defective Pricing Defense - Army Blackhawk Spare Parts Overcharging 2011 Investigative Finding $1,000,000
View all contractor misconduct data for United Technologies Sources: Federal Contractor Misconduct Database from POGO

EPA Violations

27 Enforcement Actions

Figures are based on data from the Environmental Protection Agency’s ECHO website. The ECHO database contains federal and state environmental enforcement actions. Data displayed here includes only those actions that began after 2000 and resulted in fines of over $1 million.

Actions where the company was the sole defendant are listed first. Actions where the company is one of multiple defendants are listed subsequently.

For more information see our EPA methodology page.

covers through EPA's October 19, 2011 release
Case Name Defendant Date Locations Amount
San Gabriel / Puente Valley (Carrier) Carrier Corporation 2006 City Of Industry, ... $28,493,750
San Gabriel / Puente Valley - Uao Carrier Corporation 2001 City Of Industry, ... $10,000,000
Southeast Rockford Groundwater Consent Decree (Cercla) Hamilton Sustrand 2008 Rockford, Il $7,900,000
Exxon Mobil Corporation (Beede Waste Oil Superfund Site) Pratt & Whitney (+94 others) 2008 Plaistow, Nh $30,607,481
Little Mississinewa River Unilateral Admin Order (Cercla) United Technologies Corporation (+1 others) 2005 Union City, In $29,000,000
3m Company United Technologies Corporation (+106 others) 2008 Wood Ridge, Nj $18,000,000
Casmalia - De Minimis Aoc United Technologies (+191 others) 2004 Casmalia, Ca $11,900,000
Agere Systems, Et Al Carrier Corporation (United Technologies) (+138 others) 2007 Elkton, Md $11,300,000
Omega Chemical Site Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (+101 others) 2005 Whittier, Ca $10,147,354
Lwd, Inc. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp. (+84 others) 2007 Calvert City, Ky $10,000,000
View all EPA violations data for United Technologies Sources: EPA ECHO Enforcement Data

Advisory Committees

45 people on 32 committees

Data is based on disclosures required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Matches are based on the occurrence of the company name in the committee member affiliation. Variations in company names may cause some matches to be missed.

The table shows only the top 10 agencies. To search and download raw records from the complete dataset see the FACA data section.

covers through 2011

Table shows employees of "United Technologies" that sat on federal advisory committees.

  • Agency
  • Representation
  • Toggle National Science Foundation 26 people on 17 committees
  • Toggle National Aeronautics and Space Administration 3 people on 3 committees
  • Toggle Department of State 5 people on 2 committees
  • Toggle Department of Commerce 5 people on 3 committees
  • Toggle Department of Defense 4 people on 2 committees
  • Toggle Department of Energy 2 people on 2 committees
  • Toggle Office of Personnel Management 1 person on 1 committee
  • Toggle Environmental Protection Agency 1 person on 1 committee
  • Toggle Antitrust Modernization Commission 1 person on 1 committee
View all advisory committee data for United Technologies