Save the Bay
Campaign Finance$500 Given
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
- Employee Color Block
- PAC Color Block
Republicans vs. Democratsin dollars
State vs. Federalin dollars
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of Save the Bay
Names of Lobbyists
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Environment & Superfund
RegulationsMentioned in 25 dockets
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Save the Bay" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for Save the Bay
- Toggle 8 EPA Draft Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load 2010
- Toggle 6 EPA Executive Order 13508, Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration, Section 202 Federal Agency Reports on Key Challenges and Section 203 Draft Strategy for Restoration and Protection of the Chesapeake Bay 2009
- Toggle 5 EPA Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Estuaries and Coastal Waters 2010
- Toggle 3 FWS Interagency Cooperation Under the Endangered Species Act 2009
- Toggle 2 EPA Maryland- 2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory, Reasonable Further Progress Plan, Reasonably Available Control Measures, and Transportation Conformity Budgets for the Baltimore 1997 8-Hour Moderate Ozone Nonattainment Area 2009
- Toggle 2 EPA Maryland- 2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory, Reasonable Further Progress Plan, Reasonably Available Control Measures, and Transportation Conformity Budgets for the Philadelphia 1997 8-Hour Moderate Ozone Nonattainment Area 2009
- Toggle 2 BOEM Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Assessment for Commercial Wind Lease Issuance and Site Assessment Activities on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf Offshore New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia (Mid-Atlantic Regional EA) 2010
- Toggle 1 EPA Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing NESHAP Risk and Technology Review 2010
- Toggle 1 EPA Mineral Wool Production NESHAP Risk and Technology Review 2010
- Toggle 1 EPA Proposed Information Collection Request for the Chesapeake Action Plan/Activity Integration Plan (CAP/AIP) Reporting System. 2009
Advisory Committees2 people on 2 committees
Data is based on disclosures required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Matches are based on the occurrence of the company name in the committee member affiliation. Variations in company names may cause some matches to be missed.
The table shows only the top 10 agencies. To search and download raw records from the complete dataset see the FACA data section.