Rio Tinto Group
The Rio Tinto Group is a diversified, British-Australian, multinational mining and resources group with headquarters in London and Melbourne. The company was founded in 1873, when a multinational consortium of investors purchased a mine complex on the Rio Tinto river, in Huelva, Spain from the Spanish government. Since then, the company has grown through a long series of mergers and acquisitions to place itself among the world leaders in the production of many commodities, including aluminium, iron ore, copper, uranium, coal, and diamonds. Although primarily focused on extraction of minerals, Rio Tinto also has significant operations in refining, particularly for refining bauxite and iron ore. The company has operations on six continents but is mainly concentrated in Australia and Canada, and owns gross assets valued at $81 billion through a complex web of wholly and partly owned subsidiaries. In 2007, the company was valued at $147 billion. Its head office in the United Kingdom is in the City of Westminster, London, while its Australian head office is in the City of Melbourne.
Campaign Finance$19,870 Given
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
- Employee Color Block
- PAC Color Block
Republicans vs. Democratsin dollars
State vs. Federalin dollars
Top PAC Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- PAC Color Block
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of Rio Tinto Group
Names of Lobbyists
Firm Hired Amount Rio Tinto Group $6,047,635
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Natural Resources,
- Environment & Superfund,
- Energy & Nuclear Power,
- Real Estate & Land Use,
- Fed Budget & Appropriations,
- Labor, Antitrust & Workplace,
- Disaster & Emergency Planning
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title H.R.1904 Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2011 S.409 Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2009 H.R.2509 Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2009 H.R.4880 Copper Basin Jobs Act H.R.2454 American Clean Energy And Security Act of 2009 S.26 Elimination of Double Subsidies for the Hardrock MiningIndustry Act of 2011 H.R.190 Protecting America's Workers Act H.R.699 Hardrock Mining and Reclamation Act of 2009 S.796 Hardrock Mining and Reclamation Act of 2009 S.153 Robert C. Byrd Mine and Workplace Safety and Health Act of 2011
RegulationsMentioned in 10 dockets
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Rio Tinto Group" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for Rio Tinto Group
- Toggle 2 EPA Approval, Disapproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Arizona; Regional Haze State Implementation Plan and Interstate Transport Plan; Interference with Visibility Requirement 2012
- Toggle 1 EPA Clean Air Transport Rule 2009
- Toggle 1 EPA Low-Activity Mixed Waste 2003
- Toggle 1 USTR GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES (GSP): NOTICE REGARDING THE INITIATION OF THE 2011 ANNUAL GSP PRODUCT AND COUNTRY ELIGIBILITY PRACTICES REVIEW AND DEADLINES FOR FILING PETITIONS 2011
- Toggle 1 EPA Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act and Assessing the Environmental Effects Abroad of EPA Actions 2005
- Toggle 1 MSHA Safety and Health Management Programs for Mines 2010
- Toggle 1 EPA Technical Review of NSPS Subpart J 2007
- Toggle 1 NRC Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY 2005 2005
- Toggle 1 DOE This docket contains Federal Register Notices from the DOE FDMS Sandbox. 2009
- Toggle 1 OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION 2006
EPA Violations2 Enforcement Actions
Figures are based on data from the Environmental Protection Agency’s ECHO website. The ECHO database contains federal and state environmental enforcement actions. Data displayed here includes only those actions that began after 2000 and resulted in fines of over $1 million.
Actions where the company was the sole defendant are listed first. Actions where the company is one of multiple defendants are listed subsequently.
For more information see our EPA methodology page.
|Bingham Magna Ditch Site||Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation||2007||Copperton, Ut||$5,000,000|
|Armour Road Npl Site; U.S. Borax, Inc||U.S. Borax, Inc (+4 others)||2006||North Kansas City, ...||$6,900,000|