Procter & Gamble Co. (P&G;, NYSE: PG) is a Fortune 500 American multinational corporation headquartered in Downtown Cincinnati, Ohio that manufactures a wide range of consumer goods. It is 6th in Fortune's Most Admired Companies 2010 list. P&G; is credited with many business innovations including brand management and the soap opera.
Some of this data may be out of date
State influence data from the National Institute on Money in State Politics changed in format and availability during the 2013-2014 election cycle. While we work to integrate their new style of data release, state-level campaign finance data for the 2014 cycle and beyond will be unavailable. We apologize for the inconvenience, but heartily recommend trying out their snazzy new site at FollowTheMoney.org!
Campaign Finance$6,597,732 Given
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
state-level data is not available in bulk for 2014. for current state data, browse http://followthemoney.org/
- PAC Color Block
- Organization's PAC(s)
- Employee Color Block
- Associated Individuals
Republicans vs. Democratsin dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation.
State vs. Federalin dollars
Top PAC Recipients
- PAC Color Block
- Organization's PAC(s)
- Employee Color Block
- Associated Individuals
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of Procter & Gamble
Names of Lobbyists
Firm Hired Amount Procter & Gamble $57,286,074
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Health Issues,
- Environment & Superfund,
- Chemical Industry,
- Medicare & Medicaid,
- Foreign Relations,
- Consumer Product Safety,
- Law Enforcement & Crime
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title H.R.4213 Tax Extenders Act of 2009 H.R.2735 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the look-through treatment of payments between related controlled foreign corporations. H.R.3735 (Unknown) H.R.3970 Tax Reduction and Reform Act of 2007 S.510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act H.R.496 Trade Enforcement Act of 2009 H.R.554 National Nanotechnology Initiative Amendments Act of 2009 H.R.639 Currency Reform for Fair Trade Act H.R.1260 Patent Reform Act of 2009
RegulationsMentioned in 437 dockets; Submitted to 38 dockets
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Procter & Gamble" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
Documents Submitted by the Organization
View all submissions data for Procter & Gamble
- Toggle 5 FDA Over-the-Counter Cough and Cold Medications for Pediatric Use; Notice of Public Hearing 2008
- Toggle 5 SEC Comments on Proposed Rules for Implementing the Whistleblower Provisions of Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 2010
- Toggle 3 FDA Health-Care Antiseptic Drug Products for Over-the-Counter (OTC) Human Use 1975
- Toggle 3 SEC Comments on Proposed Rule: Facilitating Shareholder Director Nominations 2009
- Toggle 2 FDA Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications [510(k)]; Availability 2011
- Toggle 2 SEC Comments on Proposed Rule: Security Holder Director Nominations 2003
- Toggle 2 FDA Medical Devices 1976
- Toggle 2 FAA Notice of Proposed Modification to the June 1, 2006 MOA FAA/Subscriber Memorandum of Agreement for ASDI/NASSI Industry Access and Request for Comments 2011
- Toggle 1 USTR Request for Comments Concerning Free Trade Agreement With the Republic of Colombia 2009
- Toggle 1 FDA Aflatoxin in Shelled Peanuts & Peanut Products-CLOSED 1978
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for Procter & Gamble
- Toggle 22 FDA Health-Care Antiseptic Drug Products for Over-the-Counter (OTC) Human Use 1975
- Toggle 12 FDA Bulk Drug Substances That May Be Used to Compound Drug Products in Accordance With Section 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Concerning Outsourcing Facilities; Request for Nominations 2013
- Toggle 11 FDA Over-the-Counter Cough and Cold Medications for Pediatric Use; Notice of Public Hearing 2008
- Toggle 9 FDA Sunscreen Drug Products 1978
- Toggle 9 FRA Environmental Review of Dakota Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Powder River Expansion Project Loan Application 2006
- Toggle 8 USCG Cabrillo Port Liquefied Natural Gas Deepwater Port License Application 2004
- Toggle 8 EPA Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Non-Attainment New Source Review (NSR): Baseline Emissions Determination, Actual-to-Future-Actual Methodology, Plantwide Applicability Limitations, Clean Units, Pollution Control Projects (Reconsideration) 2001
- Toggle 8 FDA PERMANENT LISTING OF D&C RED NO. 33 1987
- Toggle 7 EERE Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products; Energy Conservation Standards for Three Cleaning Products. Cross reference EERE-2006-BT-GUID-0168 2006
- Toggle 7 FDA Antigingivitis & Antiplaque-Related Claims 1981
EPA Violations2 Enforcement Actions
Figures are based on data from the Environmental Protection Agency’s ECHO website. The ECHO database contains federal and state environmental enforcement actions. Data displayed here includes only those actions that began after 2000 and resulted in fines of over $1 million.
Actions where the company was the sole defendant are listed first. Actions where the company is one of multiple defendants are listed subsequently.
For more information see our EPA methodology page.
|Industrial Pollution Control (Ipc) (Cost Recovery Agmt)||Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company (+236 others)||2003||Jackson, Ms||$3,440,369|
|Fox River Nrda/Pcb Releases De Minimis (Cercla)||The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Co. (+10 others)||2009||Green Bay, Wi||$1,582,954|
Advisory Committees28 people on 23 committees
Data is based on disclosures required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Matches are based on the occurrence of the company name in the committee member affiliation. Variations in company names may cause some matches to be missed.
The table shows only the top 10 agencies. To search and download raw records from the complete dataset see the FACA data section.
Table shows employees of "Procter & Gamble" that sat on federal advisory committees.
- Toggle National Science Foundation 6 people on 5 committees
- Toggle Environmental Protection Agency 6 people on 5 committees
- Toggle Department of Health and Human Services 4 people on 4 committees
- Toggle Department of State 4 people on 3 committees
- Toggle Department of Commerce 3 people on 2 committees
- Toggle Office of the United States Trade Representative 2 people on 1 committee
- Toggle Commission on Civil Rights 1 person on 1 committee
- Toggle Department of Agriculture 1 person on 1 committee
- Toggle Agency for International Development 1 person on 1 committee