Pfizer Animal Health
Campaign Finance$4,251 Given
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
- Employee Color Block
- PAC Color Block
Republicans vs. Democratsin dollars
State vs. Federalin dollars
Top PAC Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- PAC Color Block
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of Pfizer Animal Health
Names of Lobbyists
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
RegulationsMentioned in 48 dockets; Submitted to 9 dockets
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Pfizer Animal Health" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
Documents Submitted by the Organization
View all submissions data for Pfizer Animal Health
- Toggle 1 APHIS Viruses, Serums, Toxins, and Analogous Products; Expiration Date Required for Serials and Subserials and Determination of Expiration Date of Product 2009
- Toggle 1 FDA Regulation for establishing import tolerances 2001
- Toggle 1 FDA Approaches to Reducing Sodium Consumption 2011
- Toggle 1 FDA Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Sample Collection Plan for Dogs Treated With SLENTROL 2010
- Toggle 1 FSIS Reducing Sodium in the Food Supply; Establishing Sodium Reduction Targets; Establishment of Dockets; Request for Comments, Data and Information 2011
- Toggle 1 APHIS Viruses, Serums, Toxins, and Analogous Products; Records and Reports 2005
- Toggle 1 FDA New Animal Drugs; Cephalosporin Drugs; Extralabel Animal Drug Use; Order of Prohibition 2008
- Toggle 1 FDA Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Waiver of In Vivo Demonstration of Bioequivalence of Animal Drugs in Soluble Powder Oral Dosage Form Products and Type A Medicated Articles - CLOSED 2011
- Toggle 1 APHIS Viruses, Serums, Toxins, and Analogous Products; Packaging and Labeling 2008
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for Pfizer Animal Health
- Toggle 3 FDA ANADA Suitability Petition for Generic Florfenicol for Swine Drinking Water 2012
- Toggle 3 FDA NADA/ANADA Notices 2010
- Toggle 3 FDA File an Abbreviated New Animal Drug Application (ANDA) for Carprofen Soft Chewable Tablet Which Differs From the Pioneer, RIMADYL®(carprofen) Approved Under NADA 141-111 2009
- Toggle 2 EPA Notice of Receipt of a Request from the State of Texas for a Waiver of a Portion of the Renewable Fuel Standards 2008
- Toggle 2 FDA New Animal Drugs; Cephalosporin Drugs; Extralabel Animal Drug Use; Order of Prohibition 2008
- Toggle 2 GIPSA Implementation of Regulations Required Under Title XI of the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008; Conduct in Violation of the Act 2010
- Toggle 2 FDA Antiparasitic Drug Use and Resistance in Ruminants and Equines Public Meeting; Request for Comments 2012
- Toggle 2 FDA ANADA Suitability for generic version of EXCENEL RTU, ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension 2005
- Toggle 2 EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Regulation and Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs). 2002
- Toggle 2 EPA Notice of Filing for New Active Ingredient - Demiditraz 2009