Internet Commerce Coalition

Parent Organization: DLA Piper

Lobbying

$910,000 Spent
Information

Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.

For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.

Lobbying on Behalf of Internet Commerce Coalition

  • Names of Lobbyists
  • Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
    • Computers & Information Tech,
    • Copyright, Patent & Trademark
  • Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
    Bill No. Title
    S.968 PIPA
    H.R.2471 To amend section 2710 of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that a video tape service provider may obtain a consumer's informed, written consent on an ongoing basis and that consent may be obtained through the Internet.
    H.R.2577 SAFE Data Act
    S.1207 Data Security and Breach Notification Act of 2011
    H.R.3261 Stop Online Piracy Act
    S.1408 Data Breach Notification Act of 2011
    S.1490 Pregnancy Assistance Fund Expansion Act
    S.1535 Personal Data Protection and Breach Accountability Act of 2011
    S.3342 SECURE IT
    H.R.611 BEST PRACTICES Act
View all lobbying data for Internet Commerce Coalition Sources: OpenSecrets.org

Regulations

Mentioned in 2 dockets; Submitted to 1 docket
Information

All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.

Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.

Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.

Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.

updated daily from Regulations.gov by way of Docket Wrench

The tables show occurrences of "Internet Commerce Coalition" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.