Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC; SEHK: 4335; Euronext: INCO) is an American global technology company and the world's largest semiconductor chip maker, based on revenue. It is the inventor of the x86 series of microprocessors, the processors found in most personal computers. Intel was founded on July 18, 1968, as Integrated Electronics Corporation (though a common misconception is that "Intel" is from the word intelligence) and is based in Santa Clara, California, USA. Intel also makes motherboard chipsets, network interface controllers and integrated circuits, flash memory, graphic chips, embedded processors and other devices related to communications and computing. Founded by semiconductor pioneers Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore and widely associated with the executive leadership and vision of Andrew Grove, Intel combines advanced chip design capability with a leading-edge manufacturing capability. Originally known primarily to engineers and technologists, Intel's "Intel Inside" advertising campaign of the 1990s made it and its Pentium processor household names.
Some of this data may be out of date
State influence data from the National Institute on Money in State Politics changed in format and availability during the 2013-2014 election cycle. While we work to integrate their new style of data release, state-level campaign finance data for the 2014 cycle and beyond will be unavailable. We apologize for the inconvenience, but heartily recommend trying out their snazzy new site at FollowTheMoney.org!
Campaign Finance$10,667,942 Given
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
state-level data is not available in bulk for 2014. for current state data, browse http://followthemoney.org/
- PAC Color Block
- Organization's PAC(s)
- Employee Color Block
- Associated Individuals
Republicans vs. Democratsin dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation.
State vs. Federalin dollars
Top PAC Recipients
- PAC Color Block
- Organization's PAC(s)
- Employee Color Block
- Associated Individuals
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of Intel Corp
Names of Lobbyists
Firm Hired Amount Intel Corp $64,407,529 Fleishman-Hillard Inc $0
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Computers & Information Tech,
- Copyright, Patent & Trademark,
- Health Issues,
- Environment & Superfund,
- Science & Technology
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title H.R.3200 America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 H.R.2068 Medicare Telehealth Enhancement Act of 2009 H.R.3523 Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 S.413 Cybersecurity and Internet Freedom Act H.R.4263 SECURE IT Act of 2012 H.R.558 Achievement Through Technology and Innovation Act of 2009
Recent Lobbying Contracts
Date Registrant Summary May 19, 2015 Locke Liddell Strategies Free trade legislation and TPA, TPP, TTIP Telehealth, Precision medicine, Interoperability Patent litigation reform Immigration reform View registration
RegulationsMentioned in 1831 dockets; Submitted to 66 dockets
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Intel Corp" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
Documents Submitted by the Organization
View all submissions data for Intel Corp
- Toggle 5 SEC Comments on Proposed Rule: Facilitating Shareholder Director Nominations 2009
- Toggle 3 SEC Comments on Proposed Rule: Security Holder Director Nominations 2003
- Toggle 3 SEC Comments on Proposed Rule: Executive Compensation and Related Party Disclosure 2006
- Toggle 2 DOT Special Rules for Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (beyond-perimeter exemptions, i.e., service to another airport more than 1,250 miles away from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport) 2012
- Toggle 2 SEC Comments on Proposed Rule: Additional Form 8-K Disclosure Requirements and Acceleration of Filing Date 2002
- Toggle 2 FAA Top Intel, Inc. - Exemption/Rulemaking 2015
- Toggle 1 USTR Request for Comments Concerning Free Trade Agreement With the Republic of Korea 2009
- Toggle 1 SEC Roadmap for the Potential Use of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards by U.S. Issuers 2008
- Toggle 1 HHS Meaningful use of Healthcare Information Technology 2009
- Toggle 1 USTR Request for Comments on Proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Agreement 2009
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for Intel Corp
- Toggle 1108 EPA Revisions to Motor Vehicle Fuel Economy Label 2009
- Toggle 516 EPA Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions for New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 2013
- Toggle 125 DOT Review of Data Filed by Certificated or Commuter Air Carriers to Support Continuing Fitness Determinations Involving Citizenship Issues 2003
- Toggle 40 EPA Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 2013
- Toggle 30 DOT 2005/2006 U.S.-China Air Services Case and Designations 2004
- Toggle 30 FRA Use of Locomotive Horns and Grade Crossings 1999
- Toggle 30 DOT 2007 U.S.-China Frequency Allocation Proceeding 2006
- Toggle 25 USCIS Allowing Certain H-4 Dependent Spouses to Apply for Employment Authorization 2010
- Toggle 21 EPA Prevention of Significant Deterioration Non-Attainment Area New Source Review (Renewal) 2004
- Toggle 21 SEC Proposed Rule: Conflict Minerals 2010
Federal Spending13 grants
Federal grants, contracts and loans are reported by federal agencies using the FPDS and FAADS systems. The data is made available to the public at USASpending.gov. Please note that the completeness and quality of the data varies greatly by agency.
Only grants, contracts and loans with amounts over $1 million are shown.
Because company names are not reported in a standardized manner, we cannot reliably determine the company receiving the contract or award. The results shown here are based on a search for the company name. Individual records may be missed or erroneously included because of name variations. For more information, please see our federal spending methodology page.
Note: Company names in federal spending data are not standardized. The table below is included only as a sample of what is available in the data and has not been reviewed for accuracy or completeness. To investigate the data further, use the links at the bottom of the table.
|Intel Corporation||2010||National Security Agency/Central Security Service||TADPOLE||$6,515,638|
|Intel Corporation||2010||National Security Agency/Central Security Service||RESEARCH||$5,049,839|
|Intel Corporation||2012||Dept Of Defense||RESEARCH||$3,931,532|
|Intel Corporation||2009||Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa)||AVALANCHE PHOTODECTOR SILICON PHOTONICSE||$3,393,768|
|Intel Corporation||2011||National Security Agency/Central Security Service||RESEARCH||$2,998,221|
|Intel Corporation||2012||National Security Agency/Central Security Service||RESEARCH||$2,847,437|
|Intel Corporation||2011||Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa)||RUNNEMEDE (UBIQUITOUS HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING) PROGRAM||$2,631,674|
|Intel Corporation||2011||Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa)||RUNNEMEDE (UBIQUITOUS HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING) PROGRAM||$2,143,910|
|Intel Corporation||2010||Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa)||RUNNEMEDE (UBIQUITOUS HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING) PROGRAM||$2,025,000|
|Intel Corporation||2011||Dept Of The Air Force||Information Technology Research Period of Performance: mm/dd/yyyy to mm/dd//yyyy In Reference to: BAA-USAFA-2009-1||$1,927,036|
Advisory Committees155 people on 80 committees
Data is based on disclosures required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Matches are based on the occurrence of the company name in the committee member affiliation. Variations in company names may cause some matches to be missed.
The table shows only the top 10 agencies. To search and download raw records from the complete dataset see the FACA data section.
Table shows employees of "Intel Corp" that sat on federal advisory committees.
- Toggle National Science Foundation 117 people on 35 committees
- Toggle Department of Defense 11 people on 15 committees
- Toggle Department of Commerce 11 people on 10 committees
- Toggle Environmental Protection Agency 10 people on 4 committees
- Toggle Department of Health and Human Services 3 people on 4 committees
- Toggle Department of Homeland Security 2 people on 2 committees
- Toggle Federal Communications Commission 2 people on 2 committees
- Toggle Department of the Treasury 2 people on 2 committees
- Toggle Department of Transportation 2 people on 1 committee
- Toggle Office of the United States Trade Representative 1 person on 1 committee