Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher is a global law firm, founded in Los Angeles in 1890. The firm is one of the most prestigious and selective in the nation, and ranks among the most successful firms globally. Gibson Dunn has nearly 1000 attorneys and over 2000 staff located in 15 offices around the world, including North and South America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Gibson Dunn clients include some of the world's largest multinational corporations in all major industries, leading government entities, commercial and investment banks, start-up ventures, emerging growth businesses, partnerships and individuals. The Chambers Guide names more than 100 Gibson Dunn attorneys among the leading lawyers in their respective fields, and American Lawyer recognized Gibson Dunn as the "Top Litigation Department" of the year for 2010.

Source: Wikipedia

Campaign Finance

Information

Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:

  • contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
  • only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
  • contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
  • corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
  • organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.

For more information, please see our campaign finance methodology page. Lobbyist bundling data is described on our lobbyist bundling methodology page.

Latest FEC Data

covers through committee's December 31, 2010 filing.
Download all contributions to Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher

  • Summary

    overview of the committee's finances
    Total Raised:
    $119,536
    Total Spent:
    $120,272
    Cash on Hand:
    $60,070
    Debts:
    $0

Standardized Donation Information

covers roughly through Q4 2012. may lag behind FEC section above, as donors and industries are identified by hand.

  • Top Recipients

    Employee Color Block
    Individuals
    PAC Color Block
    PAC
    Includes contributions from the organization’s employees, their family members, and its political action committee.

  • Republicans vs. Democrats

    in dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation.

  • State vs. Federal

    in dollars

  • Top PAC Recipients

    Employee Color Block
    Individuals
    PAC Color Block
    PAC
    Includes contributions from the organization’s employees, their family members, and its political action committee.
View all campaign finance data for Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher Sources: OpenSecrets.org FollowTheMoney.org

Lobbying

$4,355,700 Income
Information

Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.

For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.

Lobbying Carried Out by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher

View all lobbying data for Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher Sources: Lobbyist Registration Tracker OpenSecrets.org

Regulations

Mentioned in 4 dockets; Submitted to 4 dockets
Information

All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.

Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.

Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.

Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.

updated daily from Regulations.gov by way of Docket Wrench

The tables show occurrences of "Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.