General Atomics is a nuclear physics and defense contractor headquartered in San Diego, California. General Atomics’ research into fission and fusion matured into competencies in related technologies, allowing the company to expand into other fields of research. General Atomics develops systems ranging from the nuclear fuel cycle to remotely operated surveillance aircraft, airborne sensors, and advanced electric, electronic, wireless and laser technologies.
Source: Wikipedia
Campaign Finance
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
For more information, please see our campaign finance methodology page. Lobbyist bundling data is described on our lobbyist bundling methodology page.
Latest FEC Data
covers through committee's December 31, 2010 filing.-
Summary
overview of the committee's finances- Total Raised:
- $478,895
- Total Spent:
- $465,172
- Cash on Hand:
- $95,084
- Debts:
- $0
Standardized Donation Information
covers roughly through Q4 2012. may lag behind FEC section above, as donors and industries are identified by hand.-
Top Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
-
Republicans vs. Democrats
in dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation. -
State vs. Federal
in dollars -
Top PAC Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
Lobbying
$4,740,000 SpentFigures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of General Atomics
-
Names of Lobbyists
-
Firm Hired Amount General Atomics $4,500,000 -
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Defense,
- Fed Budget & Appropriations,
- Homeland Security,
- Transportation,
- Energy & Nuclear Power,
- Taxes,
- Science & Technology
-
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title H.R.5136 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 S.3800 Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2011 S.3454 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 S.3607 Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2011 H.R.2647 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 H.R.4899 Disaster Relief and Summer Jobs Act of 2010 H.R.3326 Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010 S.1390 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 S.3635 Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2011 S.3280 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 -
Recent Lobbying Contracts
Date Registrant Summary Feb. 25, 2013 Baker, Donelson et al Assist the company in issues concerning export of mission critical ISR capabilities. View registration
Regulations
Mentioned in 16 docketsAll data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "General Atomics" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
-
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for General Atomics
Sources:
Regulations.gov
Earmarks
$20,440,000 ReceivedFigures are based on both committee earmark disclosures and on analysis of appropriations bill text. Table shows top 10 earmarks, ordered by dollar amount in the final version of the bill.
For more information, see our Earmark Methodology page.
Top Earmarks
| Fiscal Year | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | $5,000,000 | General Atomics: Holloman High Speed Test Track |
| 2010 | $3,840,000 | General Atomics: Sewage-Derived Biofuels Project |
| 2010 | $3,520,000 | General Atomics: Hawaii Microalgae Biofuel Project |
| 2010 | $2,080,000 | General Atomics: Portable Sensor for Toxic Gas Detection |
| 2010 | $1,600,000 | General Atomics: Watchkeeper |
| 2010 | $1,600,000 | General Atomics: Military Waste-to-Energy Project using the Hydro-Thermal Energy Conversion (Hy-TEC) Process |
| 2010 | $1,600,000 | Texas A&M AgriLIFE Research Center General Atomics: Strategic Biofuels Supply System |
| 2010 | $1,200,000 | General Atomics: Surveillance Augmentation Vehicle |
Federal Spending
7 grants; 85 contractsFederal grants, contracts and loans are reported by federal agencies using the FPDS and FAADS systems. The data is made available to the public at USASpending.gov. Please note that the completeness and quality of the data varies greatly by agency.
Only grants, contracts and loans with amounts over $1 million are shown.
Because company names are not reported in a standardized manner, we cannot reliably determine the company receiving the contract or award. The results shown here are based on a search for the company name. Individual records may be missed or erroneously included because of name variations. For more information, please see our federal spending methodology page.
Note: Company names in federal spending data are not standardized. The table below is included only as a sample of what is available in the data and has not been reviewed for accuracy or completeness. To investigate the data further, use the links at the bottom of the table.
| Type | Recipient Name | Year | Agency | Description | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
contract |
General Atomics | 2010 | INCREMENTAL FUNDING | $201,414,100 | |
contract |
General Atomics | 2009 | CVN 78 PRODUCTION EMALS | $65,000,000 | |
contract |
General Atomics | 2009 | EMALS SHIP SET FUNDING | $39,109,400 | |
contract |
General Atomics | 2010 | INCREMENTAL FUNDING MOD | $32,184,000 | |
contract |
General Atomics | 2010 | EMALS | $31,332,000 | |
contract |
General Atomics | 2009 | FY09 INCREMENTAL FUNDING | $27,545,000 | |
contract |
General Atomics | 2009 | EMALS | $26,245,579 | |
contract |
General Atomics | 2010 | FY10 INCREMENTAL FUNDING PROVIDED | $25,400,000 | |
contract |
General Atomics | 2009 | PHASE I - ALGAL-DERIVED JP-8 SURROGATE | $19,946,886 | |
contract |
General Atomics | 2010 | PHASE II - ALGAL-DERIVED JP-8 SURROGATE OPTION EXERCISE | $15,000,000 |
EPA Violations
1 Enforcement ActionsFigures are based on data from the Environmental Protection Agency’s ECHO website. The ECHO database contains federal and state environmental enforcement actions. Data displayed here includes only those actions that began after 2000 and resulted in fines of over $1 million.
Actions where the company was the sole defendant are listed first. Actions where the company is one of multiple defendants are listed subsequently.
For more information see our EPA methodology page.
| Case Name | Defendant | Date | Locations | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casmalia Superfund Site De Minimis Settlement 99-02(C)(Supp)(2) | General Atomics (+34 others) | 2009 | Casmalia, Ca | $1,250,000 |
Advisory Committees
5 people on 4 committeesData is based on disclosures required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Matches are based on the occurrence of the company name in the committee member affiliation. Variations in company names may cause some matches to be missed.
The table shows only the top 10 agencies. To search and download raw records from the complete dataset see the FACA data section.
Table shows employees of "General Atomics" that sat on federal advisory committees.
View all advisory committee data for General Atomics