Fluor Corporation is a publicly owned engineering, procurement, construction, and maintenance services organization. Fluor is headquartered in the Las Colinas area of Irving, Texas. The company employs more than 41,000 international employees and maintains offices in over 25 countries. Fluor is a Fortune 500 and a S&P; 500 company.
Campaign Finance$7,869,807 Given
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
- Employee Color Block
- PAC Color Block
Republicans vs. Democratsin dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation.
State vs. Federalin dollars
Top PAC Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- PAC Color Block
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of Fluor Corp
Names of Lobbyists
Firm Hired Amount Fluor Corp $11,326,093
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Energy & Nuclear Power,
- Government Issues,
- Labor, Antitrust & Workplace,
- Fed Budget & Appropriations,
- Environment & Superfund,
- Marine, Boats & Fisheries
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title H.R.2054 Energy and Revenue Enrichment Act of 2011 H.R.2354 Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012 H.R.1280 To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to require congressional approval of agreements for peaceful nuclear cooperation with foreign countries, and for other purposes. H.R.2072 Securing American Jobs Through Exports Act of 2011 H.R.674 3% Withholding Repeal and Job Creation Act S.512 Nuclear Power 2021 Act H.R.7 Sportfishing and Recreational Boating Safety Act of 2012 H.R.4297 Workforce Investment Improvement Act of 2012 S.1813 MAP-21
Recent Lobbying Contracts
Date Registrant Summary Sept. 23, 2013 American Defense International Meetings with officials regarding small power plant issues. View registration
RegulationsMentioned in 54 dockets; Submitted to 5 dockets
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Fluor Corp" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
Documents Submitted by the Organization
View all submissions data for Fluor Corp
- Toggle 1 EIB Agency Information Collection Activities: Questionnaire Regarding Activities Related to the Republic of Iran - Form EIB 10-01 2010
- Toggle 1 DOE Assistance to Foreign Atomic Energy Activities 2011
- Toggle 1 BIS Mandatory Electronic Filing of Export and Reexport License Applications, Classification Requests, Encryption Review Requests, and License Exceptions AGR Notifications 2007
- Toggle 1 OSHA Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health(ACCSH); Request for Nominations 2007
- Toggle 1 OSHA EXPLOSIVES 2007
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for Fluor Corp
- Toggle 4 NRC Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation 2012
- Toggle 3 EPA Preliminary 2006 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan 2004
- Toggle 3 DOE Assistance to Foreign Atomic Energy Activities 2011
- Toggle 3 EPA Preliminary 2008 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan 2006
- Toggle 3 ITA Recently Posted ITA Rules and Notices. Unknown
- Toggle 2 DOT 2005/2006 U.S.-China Air Services Case and Designations 2004
- Toggle 2 EPA Petrol Refinery Fuel Gas NSPS Review 2004
- Toggle 2 EPA North Dakota Regional Haze State Implementation Plan 2010
- Toggle 2 EPA Initial Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit for the Desert Rock Energy Facility 2007
- Toggle 2 EPA Michigan Regional Haze plan 2010
Federal Spending8 contracts
Federal grants, contracts and loans are reported by federal agencies using the FPDS and FAADS systems. The data is made available to the public at USASpending.gov. Please note that the completeness and quality of the data varies greatly by agency.
Only grants, contracts and loans with amounts over $1 million are shown.
Because company names are not reported in a standardized manner, we cannot reliably determine the company receiving the contract or award. The results shown here are based on a search for the company name. Individual records may be missed or erroneously included because of name variations. For more information, please see our federal spending methodology page.
Note: Company names in federal spending data are not standardized. The table below is included only as a sample of what is available in the data and has not been reviewed for accuracy or completeness. To investigate the data further, use the links at the bottom of the table.
|Fluor Corporation||2007||Federal Emergency Management Agency||THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION TO TASK ORDER HSFEHQ-07-J-0001 KS-1711 IS: 1. EXTEND THE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (POP) FROM 10/07/2008 TO 11/07/2008. 2. NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE GOVERNMENT (NO NEW FUNDING REQUIRED). 3. THERE ARE SUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT THIS POP EXTENSION.||$58,604,616|
|Fluor Corporation||2008||Federal Emergency Management Agency||FORMALDEHYDE TESTING PROJECT||$7,000,000|
|Fluor Corporation||2009||Federal Emergency Management Agency||FORMALDEHYDE TESTING PROJECT||$5,000,000|
|Fluor Corporation||2008||Federal Emergency Management Agency||FORMALDEHYDE TESTING PROJECT||$2,000,000|
|Fluor Corporation||2007||Federal Emergency Management Agency||UFAS RETROFIT OF GROUP SITES||$1,650,050|
|Fluor Corporation||2008||Federal Emergency Management Agency||FORMALDEHYDE TESTING PROJECT||$1,200,000|
|Fluor Corporation||2007||Federal Emergency Management Agency||NONE||$1,143,228|
|Fluor Corporation||2006||Federal Emergency Management Agency||IA TAC - PHASE-IN & READINESS||$1,112,865|
Contractor Misconduct39 Instances
This information is collected by the Project On Government Oversight from press releases, court documents, news reports and other public records. It is not meant to be an exhaustive account of all instances of federal contractor misconduct.
More information on each instance, including primary source documents, is available on POGO's site by clicking on the instance description. More information on POGO's methodology is available here.
|Misconduct Type||Hired By||Incident||Year||Disposition||Penalty|
|Health||None||Alexander et al. v. Fluor Corp. et al. (Lead Poisoning)||2011||Judgment Against Defendant||$240,000,000|
|Poor Contract Performance||International||Project Dispute||2004||Settlement||$123,000,000|
|Poor Contract Performance||International||Design and Construction Failures||2002||Settlement||$24,000,000|
|Health||Defense - Army||Dawson v. Fluor Intercontinental (Negligence)||2012||Judgment Against Defendant||$18,780,047|
|Government Contract Fraud||Multiple Agencies||Coleman v. Fluor (Violations of the False Claims Act)||2005||Settlement||$12,500,000|
|Labor||None||Anti-Union Hiring Practices||2009||Settlement||$12,000,000|
|Cost/Labor Mischarge||Multiple Agencies||Hoefer v. Fluor Daniel (Overcharging the Government)||2001||Settlement||$8,500,000|
|Government Contract Fraud||Energy||Watt v. Fluor Daniel Fernald (False Claims Act)||1997||Settlement||$8,400,000|
|Labor||Energy||Hanford Pipefitter Whistleblower Litigation||2005||Judgment Against Defendant||$4,760,000|
|Government Contract Fraud||Energy||Hanford P-Card False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Act Liability||2011||Settlement||$4,000,000|
EPA Violations2 Enforcement Actions
Figures are based on data from the Environmental Protection Agency’s ECHO website. The ECHO database contains federal and state environmental enforcement actions. Data displayed here includes only those actions that began after 2000 and resulted in fines of over $1 million.
Actions where the company was the sole defendant are listed first. Actions where the company is one of multiple defendants are listed subsequently.
For more information see our EPA methodology page.
|St Joe Minerals Corp - Viburnum Superfund Site||St Joe Minerals Corp||2007||Viburnum, Mo||$2,000,000|
|Exxon Mobil Corporation (Beede Waste Oil Superfund Site)||Fluor Power Systems (+94 others)||2008||Plaistow, Nh||$30,607,481|
Advisory Committees1 person on 1 committee
Data is based on disclosures required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Matches are based on the occurrence of the company name in the committee member affiliation. Variations in company names may cause some matches to be missed.
The table shows only the top 10 agencies. To search and download raw records from the complete dataset see the FACA data section.