Ferguson Group
Campaign Finance
$51,100 GivenFigures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
For more information, please see our campaign finance methodology page. Lobbyist bundling data is described on our lobbyist bundling methodology page.
-
Top Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
-
Republicans vs. Democrats
in dollars -
State vs. Federal
in dollars -
Top PAC Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
Lobbying
$14,965,000 IncomeFigures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying Carried Out by Ferguson Group
-
Names of Lobbyists
-
Client Amount Broward County, FL $490,000 Natl Assn of Towns & Townships $420,000 Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District $310,000 Fayetteville-Cumberland Co Chamber/Comm $280,000 City of Roseville, CA $280,000 Somach, Simmons & Dunn $280,000 Imperial Irrigation District $280,000 Modesto/Turlock Irrigation Districts $260,000 City of Folsom, CA $210,000 San Joaquin Area Flood Agency $210,000 -
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Fed Budget & Appropriations,
- Transportation,
- Natural Resources,
- Clean Air & Water,
- Environment & Superfund,
- Energy & Nuclear Power,
- Law Enforcement & Crime,
- Economics & Econ Development,
- Housing,
- Homeland Security
-
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title H.R.1 Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 H.R.7 Sportfishing and Recreational Boating Safety Act of 2012 H.R.2354 Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012 S.1813 MAP-21 S.787 Financial and Economic Literacy Improvement Act of 2011 S.365 Budget Control Act of 2011 S.933 Volunteer Responder Incentive Protection Reauthorization Act of 2011 H.R.4 Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act of 2011 H.R.658 FAA Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2011 H.R.2578 Conservation and Economic Growth Act -
Recent Lobbying Contracts
Date Client Summary April 16, 2013 Town of Southington Water Department Obtain funding for water infrastructure improvements View registration April 16, 2013 City of Fort Wayne, IN Federal funding for local priorities. View registration April 15, 2013 Byron Bethany Irrigation District Bureau of Reclamation - exchange contract for use of federal facilities for non federal water deliveries. View registration April 2, 2013 BRADY CENTER AND CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE Anti Violence Public Health and Safety Initiatives View registration Feb. 25, 2013 KARI TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL Law Enforcement Technology Funding and Policy View registration
Regulations
Mentioned in 1 docketAll data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Ferguson Group" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
-
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for Ferguson Group
Sources:
Regulations.gov
