The Exxon Mobil Corporation, or ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation. It is a direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil company, and was formed on November 30, 1999, by the merger of Exxon and Mobil. Its headquarters are in Irving, Texas.
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
Latest FEC Datacovers through committee's December 31, 2010 filing.
Summaryoverview of the committee's finances
- Total Raised:
- Total Spent:
- Cash on Hand:
Standardized Donation Informationcovers roughly through Q4 2013. may lag behind FEC section above, as donors and industries are identified by hand.
- PAC Color Block
- Organization's PAC(s)
- Employee Color Block
- Associated Individuals
Republicans vs. Democratsin dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation.
State vs. Federalin dollars
Top PAC Recipients
- PAC Color Block
- Organization's PAC(s)
- Employee Color Block
- Associated Individuals
Bundled ContributionsMoney raised by the firm from multiple donors on behalf of the recipient. The firm's own contributions are not included.
Recipient Lobbyist Amount National Republican Congressional Cmte $24,500
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of Exxon Mobil
Names of Lobbyists
Firm Hired Amount Exxon Mobil $39,880,000
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Energy & Nuclear Power,
- Fuel, Gas & Oil,
- Environment & Superfund,
- Fed Budget & Appropriations,
- Natural Resources,
- Clean Air & Water,
- Consumer Product Safety,
- Government Issues
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title H.R.2454 American Clean Energy And Security Act of 2009 S.1733 Green Taxis Act of 2009 S.1462 American Clean Energy Leadership Act of 2009 H.R.2868 Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2009 S.1700 Energy Security Through Transparency Act of 2009 S.2877 Carbon Limits and Energy for America's Renewal (CLEAR) Act H.R.3534 Consolidated Land, Energy, and Aquatic Resources Act of 2009 H.R.4173 Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010 H.R.2996 Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 H.R.2998 American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009
Recent Lobbying Contracts
Date Registrant Summary June 26, 2014 Capitol Counsel Energy and environmental policy issues; natural resource development and taxation View registration June 4, 2014 The Simmons & Russell Group, LLC Issues related to energy policy, tax policy and international trade. View registration
RegulationsMentioned in 273 dockets; Submitted to 3 dockets
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Exxon Mobil" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
Documents Submitted by the Organization
View all submissions data for Exxon Mobil
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for Exxon Mobil
- Toggle 91 EPA Clean Air Transport Rule 2009
- Toggle 37 EPA Petroleum Refining Sector Docket 2010
- Toggle 37 EPA Oil and Natural Gas Sector -- New Source Performance Standards, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, and Control Techniques Guidelines 2010
- Toggle 34 EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks; Group I Polymers and Resins; Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations; Pharmaceuticals Production; The Printing and Publishing Industry; and Steel Pickling--HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants 2010
- Toggle 27 EPA Rulemaking for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Limitations Guidelines 2009
- Toggle 27 EPA EPA/NHTSA Joint Rulemaking to Establish Light-duty Vehicle GHG Emissions Standards and CAFE Standards 2009
- Toggle 24 EPA EPA/NHTSA Joint Rulemaking to Establish Light-duty Vehicle GHG Emissions Standards and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017 and Later 2010
- Toggle 17 EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Coal- and Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units 2009
- Toggle 16 EPA Proposed Endangerment Finding for Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act (CAA) 2009
- Toggle 14 EPA Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles 2010
Federal Spending8 contracts
Federal grants, contracts and loans are reported by federal agencies using the FPDS and FAADS systems. The data is made available to the public at USASpending.gov. Please note that the completeness and quality of the data varies greatly by agency.
Only grants, contracts and loans with amounts over $1 million are shown.
Because company names are not reported in a standardized manner, we cannot reliably determine the company receiving the contract or award. The results shown here are based on a search for the company name. Individual records may be missed or erroneously included because of name variations. For more information, please see our federal spending methodology page.
Note: Company names in federal spending data are not standardized. The table below is included only as a sample of what is available in the data and has not been reviewed for accuracy or completeness. To investigate the data further, use the links at the bottom of the table.
|Exxon Mobil Corporation||2009||TURBINE FUEL, JP8||$354,571,556|
|Exxon Mobil Corporation||2010||TURBINE FUEL, AVIATION, GRADE JP8||$134,313,795|
|Exxon Mobil Corporation||2009||FUEL, NAVAL DISTILLATE, F76||$86,791,066|
|Exxon Mobil Corporation||2010||PRODUCT: TURBINE FUEL, AVIATION JP5 TO DFSP AUGUSTA AND NAS SIGONELLA. QUANTITY: 45,800,000 USG (33,300,000 BASE PERIOD; 12,500,000 6 MONTH OPTION). BASE PERIOD: AUGUST 1, 2010 - OCTOBER 31, 2011. 6 MONTH OPTION: NOVEMBER 1, 2011 - APRIL 30, 2012||$72,335,618|
|Exxon Mobil Corporation||2009||JP5||$44,228,303|
|Exxon Mobil Corporation||2010||SOLICITATION SP060009R01610002 IS APPLICABLE. NAVAL DISTILATE, F76 AND AVIATION TURBINE FUEL JP8.||$39,249,375|
|Exxon Mobil Corporation||2010||TURBINE FUEL, AVIATION, JP8||$13,373,066|
|Exxon Mobil Corporation||2009||MOGAS; MID-GRADE||$2,369,115|
Contractor Misconduct14 Instances
This information is collected by the Project On Government Oversight from press releases, court documents, news reports and other public records. It is not meant to be an exhaustive account of all instances of federal contractor misconduct.
More information on each instance, including primary source documents, is available on POGO's site by clicking on the instance description. More information on POGO's methodology is available here.
|Misconduct Type||Hired By||Incident||Year||Disposition||Penalty|
|Environment||None||Nationwide MTBE Groundwater Contamination Litigation||2009||Judgment Against Defendant||$104,700,000|
|Government Contract Fraud||Interior||U.S. ex rel. Wright v. Chevron (Underpayment of Natural Gas Royalties)||2010||Settlement||$32,200,000|
|Environment||None||Violation of Massachusetts Air Pollution Laws at Bulk Gasoline Terminals||2010||Settlement||$3,100,000|
|Environment||None||Pollution Violations at Guam and Mariana Islands Facilities||2010||Settlement||$2,400,000|
|Labor||None||Walsh v. Mobil Oil Canada (Gender Discrimination)||2010||Judgment Against Defendant||$656,920|
|Environment||None||Violation of Migratory Bird Protection Law||2009||Pleaded Guilty||$600,250|
|Labor||None||Lack of Fall Protection for Workers||2009||Fine||$40,000|
|Labor||None||Lack of Safety Protection for Contract Employee||2009||Fine||$20,000|
|Environment||None||Baltimore County Gasoline Leak: Civil Litigation (2009)||2009||Judgment Against Defendant||$0|
|Environment||None||Baton Rouge Plant Emissions: LEAN Lawsuit||2009||Pending||$0|
EPA Violations7 Enforcement Actions
Figures are based on data from the Environmental Protection Agency’s ECHO website. The ECHO database contains federal and state environmental enforcement actions. Data displayed here includes only those actions that began after 2000 and resulted in fines of over $1 million.
Actions where the company was the sole defendant are listed first. Actions where the company is one of multiple defendants are listed subsequently.
For more information see our EPA methodology page.
|Exxonmobil Oil Corporation||ExxonMobil Oil Corporation||2010||Pasadena, Tx||$350,100,000|
|Vcc Atlanta||Exxon Mobil Corporation||2009||Atlanta, Ga||$4,300,000|
|Virginia Carolina Chemical (Vcc) Winston Salem||Exxon Mobil Corporation||2010||Winston-Salem, Nc||$1,200,000|
|Cooper Drum Superfund Site Uao For Rd/Ra||Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation (+42 others)||2009||South Gate, Ca||$9,066,848|
|Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals, Llc||Exxon Mobil (+1 others)||2009||Staten Island, Ny||$5,095,000|
|Coastal Radiation Services||Exxon Mobil (+1 others)||2010||St. Gabriel, La||$4,800,000|
|Chemical Recovery Consent Decree (Cercla)||Exxon Mobil Corporation (+42 others)||2010||Elyria, Oh||$2,575,000|
Advisory Committees22 people on 23 committees
Data is based on disclosures required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Matches are based on the occurrence of the company name in the committee member affiliation. Variations in company names may cause some matches to be missed.
The table shows only the top 10 agencies. To search and download raw records from the complete dataset see the FACA data section.
Table shows employees of "Exxon Mobil" that sat on federal advisory committees.
- Toggle National Science Foundation 6 people on 6 committees
- Toggle Environmental Protection Agency 3 people on 5 committees
- Toggle Department of Energy 5 people on 4 committees
- Toggle Department of State 3 people on 2 committees
- Toggle Department of Commerce 3 people on 3 committees
- Toggle Department of Transportation 1 person on 1 committee
- Toggle Department of Homeland Security 1 person on 1 committee
- Toggle Department of Health and Human Services 1 person on 1 committee