Conrad Law & Policy Counsel
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying Carried Out by Conrad Law & Policy Counsel
Names of Lobbyists
Client Amount Bayer MaterialScience $160,000 Society of Chemical Manufacturers & Affl $45,000 Frost Brothers Resources $10,000 American Chemistry Council $0
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Chemical Industry,
- Consumer Product Safety,
- Food Industry,
- Energy & Nuclear Power,
- Labor, Antitrust & Workplace,
- Natural Resources
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title S.593 Ban Poisonous Additives Act of 2009 S.510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act H.R.2868 Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2009 H.R.2749 Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009 S.2996 Continuing Chemical Facilities Antiterrorism Security Act of 2010 H.R.2751 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act S.1462 American Clean Energy Leadership Act of 2009 S.3079 Building Star Energy Efficiency Act of 2010 S.3209 Safe Chemicals Act of 2010 H.R.753 Sewage Overflow Community Right-to-Know Act
Recent Lobbying Contracts
Date Client Summary May 5, 2015 Pavement Coatings Technology Council US Geological Survey positions regarding health and environmental effects of refined coal tar-based asphalt sealant. View registration
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.