Charles River Laboratories
Campaign Finance$600 Given
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
- Employee Color Block
- PAC Color Block
Republicans vs. Democratsin dollars
State vs. Federalin dollars
Top PAC Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- PAC Color Block
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of Charles River Laboratories
Names of Lobbyists
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Medical Research & Clin Labs
RegulationsMentioned in 44 dockets; Submitted to 4 dockets
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Charles River Laboratories" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
Documents Submitted by the Organization
View all submissions data for Charles River Laboratories
- Toggle 1 FDA FDA Transparency Task Force; Public Meeting 2009
- Toggle 1 FDA International Conference on Harmonisation; Draft Guidance on Addendum to ICH S6; Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology-Derived Pharmaceuticals S6(R1); Availability 2009
- Toggle 1 FDA International Conference on Harmonisation; Draft Guidance on Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the International Conference on Harmonisation Regions; Annex 14 on Bacterial Endotoxins Test General Chapter; Availability 2010
- Toggle 1 FDA Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies 2010
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for Charles River Laboratories
- Toggle 5 FWS 90-Day Finding on a Petition To List All Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) as Endagered 2010
- Toggle 4 EPA Special Docket OPP Aquatic Benchmarks Support Documents 2009
- Toggle 3 APHIS Environmental Assessment; Determination of Nonregulated Status of Sugar Beet Genetically Engineered for Tolerance to the Herbicide Glyphosate 2010
- Toggle 3 EPA Certain Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers: Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) and Test Rule 2010
- Toggle 3 EPA Notice of Receipt of a Petition to Suspend and Cancel All Registrations for the Soil Fumigant Iodomethane (Methyl Iodide) 2010
- Toggle 2 EPA Spirotetramat; Receipt of Pesticide Products Registration Applications. 2010
- Toggle 2 EPA Oil and Natural Gas Sector -- New Source Performance Standards, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, and Control Techniques Guidelines 2010
- Toggle 2 EPA Pesiticide Product Registration Approval; Opportunity for Public Comment; Spirotetramat 2009
- Toggle 2 EPA Draft Toxicological Review of Ethyl Teritary Butyl Ether: In Support of the Summary Information in the integrated risk Information System (IRIS) 2009
- Toggle 2 EPA Testing of Certain High Production Volume Chemicals;Test Rule and Significant New Use Rule; Fourth Group of Chemicals 2010
Federal Spending2 contracts
Federal grants, contracts and loans are reported by federal agencies using the FPDS and FAADS systems. The data is made available to the public at USASpending.gov. Please note that the completeness and quality of the data varies greatly by agency.
Only grants, contracts and loans with amounts over $1 million are shown.
Because company names are not reported in a standardized manner, we cannot reliably determine the company receiving the contract or award. The results shown here are based on a search for the company name. Individual records may be missed or erroneously included because of name variations. For more information, please see our federal spending methodology page.
Note: Company names in federal spending data are not standardized. The table below is included only as a sample of what is available in the data and has not been reviewed for accuracy or completeness. To investigate the data further, use the links at the bottom of the table.
|Charles River Laboratories Inc||2009||National Institutes Of Health||DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF A LONG TERM COLONY OF MULTIGENOTYPIC AGED MICE STRAINS||$2,090,725|
|Charles River Laboratories||2009||National Institutes Of Health||ANIMAL PRODUCTION||$1,000,000|