British Nuclear Fuels
Campaign Finance$3,000 Given
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
- Employee Color Block
- PAC Color Block
Republicans vs. Democratsin dollars
State vs. Federalin dollars
Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying on Behalf of British Nuclear Fuels
Names of Lobbyists
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Energy & Nuclear Power
RegulationsMentioned in 30 dockets
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "British Nuclear Fuels" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
Mentions in Document Text
View all mentions data for British Nuclear Fuels
- Toggle 7 NRC Controlling the Disposition of Solid Materials 1999
- Toggle 3 NRC Waste Confidence Decision Update 2008
- Toggle 3 EPA Public Health and Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada 2001
- Toggle 3 NRC Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operations 2008
- Toggle 3 EPA Amendment of 40 CFR Part 197, the Public Health and Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, NV 2005
- Toggle 2 OSHA IONIZING RADIATION 2006
- Toggle 2 EPA 40 CFR Part 194: Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance with the 40 CFR Part 191 Disposal Regulations - Post Certification Decision (Conditions, Recertifications, and Modification, Suspension, or Revocation, if Required) 2001
- Toggle 1 NRC Notice of License Amendment Request of Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC for Hematite Decommissioning Project 2009
- Toggle 1 EPA Control of Emissions From Nonroad Spark-Ignition Engines, Vessels, and Equipment 2004
- Toggle 1 EPA Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plants Compliance With the Disposal Regulations: Recertification Decision 2004