American Systems Corp

Campaign Finance

$234,941 Given
Information

Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:

  • contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
  • only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
  • contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
  • corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
  • organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.

For more information, please see our campaign finance methodology page. Lobbyist bundling data is described on our lobbyist bundling methodology page.

covers roughly through Q4 2013
  • Top Recipients

    PAC Color Block
    Organization's PAC(s)
    Employee Color Block
    Associated Individuals
    Includes contributions from the organization’s employees, their family members, and its political action committee.
  • Republicans vs. Democrats

    in dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation.
  • State vs. Federal

    in dollars
  • Top PAC Recipients

    PAC Color Block
    Organization's PAC(s)
    Employee Color Block
    Associated Individuals
    Includes contributions from the organization’s employees, their family members, and its political action committee.
View all campaign finance data for American Systems Corp Sources: OpenSecrets.org

Lobbying

$1,190,000 Spent
Information

Figures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.

For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.

covers roughly through Q4, 2013

Lobbying on Behalf of American Systems Corp

View all lobbying data for American Systems Corp Sources: OpenSecrets.org

Regulations

Mentioned in 2 dockets; Submitted to 1 docket
Information

All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.

Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.

Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.

Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.

Earmarks

$4,000,000 Received
Information

Figures are based on both committee earmark disclosures and on analysis of appropriations bill text. Table shows top 10 earmarks, ordered by dollar amount in the final version of the bill.

For more information, see our Earmark Methodology page.

Top Earmarks

Fiscal Year Amount Description
2008 $4,000,000 American Systems Corp: Radar Support -- Enhanced Detection Adjunct Processor
View all earmarks data for American Systems Corp

Federal Spending

194 contracts
Information

Federal grants, contracts and loans are reported by federal agencies using the FPDS and FAADS systems. The data is made available to the public at USASpending.gov. Please note that the completeness and quality of the data varies greatly by agency.

Only grants, contracts and loans with amounts over $1 million are shown.

Because company names are not reported in a standardized manner, we cannot reliably determine the company receiving the contract or award. The results shown here are based on a search for the company name. Individual records may be missed or erroneously included because of name variations. For more information, please see our federal spending methodology page.

covers through USASpending.gov's Sept. 15, 2012 release for contracts and Oct. 19, 2012 for grants.

Note: Company names in federal spending data are not standardized. The table below is included only as a sample of what is available in the data and has not been reviewed for accuracy or completeness. To investigate the data further, use the links at the bottom of the table.

Type Recipient Name Year Agency Description Amount
contract
American Systems Corporation 2012 USARC VOICE AND SIPRNET SUPPORT SERVICES $22,673,810
contract
American Systems Corporation 2000 Federal Acquisition Service $19,575,000
contract
American Systems Corporation 2012 Internal Revenue Service OTHER FUNCTION: NETWORK CONVERGENCE EQIPMENT AND SERVICES $16,899,914
contract
American Systems Corporation 2012 Federal Bureau Of Investigation SERVICES $16,781,934
contract
American Systems Corporation 2004 Federal Acquisition Service THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE RESOURCES TO CONDUCT ENGINEERING, TECHNICAL, AND MANAGERIAL SERVICES REQUIRED TO PERFORM THE TASKS LISTED BELOW. THIS EFFORT MAY INCLUDE ATTENDANCE AT NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA) SPONSORED MEETINGS INCLUDING TRAVEL OUTSIDE THE WASHINGTON, D.C. AREA. PROVIDE PLANNING, ANALYSIS, ACQUISITION AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR PEO SHIPS/PMS 400D AEGIS DESTROYER SHIPBUILDING PROGRAM OFFICE. A. UPDATE PROGRAM MASTER SCHEDULE ANNUALLY AND MASTER PLANNING SCHEDULE WITH PROGRAM MAJOR MILESTONES AND DETAILED SHIP CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES QUARTERLY. B. PROVIDE TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR INTERNAL PROGRAMMATIC OFFICE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING UPDATING RECORDS, CALENDARS OF SHIP CONSTRUCTION EVENTS AND TRAVEL ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE EVENTS. PROVIDE TRACKING RECORDS FOR PROGRAM OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE. C. RESEARCH, ANALYZE AND COMPILE PROGRAMMATIC, TECHNICAL, SCHEDULE, LOGISTICS AND BUDGETARY DATA FOR PMS 400D PRESENTATIONS. PROVIDE GRAPHICS AND PRESENTATIONS INCLUDING ELECTRONIC FILES, AS REQUIRED BY PMS 400D. MAINTAIN AN ELECTRONIC BOOKSHELF OR REPOSITORY FOR ALL PRESENTATIONS. D. IMPLEMENT AND MAINTAIN THE COMNAVSEASYSCOM CORPORATE DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CDMS). CDMS IS USED FOR ALL PMS 400D DOCUMENT CONTROL, STORAGE, AND RETRIEVAL. E. PROVIDE PROGRAM AND FINANCIAL DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND SYSTEM DESIGN SUPPORT TO THE OPNAV N765 REQUIREMENTS OFFICER FOR THE DDG 51 PROGRAM. CONDUCT ANALYSIS, RESEARCH, AND UPDATES REQUIRED FOR MAINTENANCE OF BUDGET DATA ESTABLISHED FOR THE OPNAV N765 REQUIREMENTS OFFICER. PREPARE SUBMITTAL OF N765 PROGRAM BUDGET EXHIBITS AND PROGRAM OBJECTIVE MEMORANDA (POM) AND ENSURE THEY ARE PROCESSED IN A TIMELY MANNER. F. PROVIDE LIAISON FUNCTIONS BETWEEN DASN (DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY) AND PEO SHIPS. $11,433,060
contract
American Systems Corporation 2009 Federal Acquisition Service SYNCHRONIZED PRE-DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONAL TRACKER (SPOT) $11,169,903
contract
American Systems Corporation 2012 Federal Acquisition Service SPOT SYSTEM - MOD 10 INCREMENTAL FUNDING $9,530,910
contract
American Systems Corporation 2004 Federal Acquisition Service PROVIDE ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO: ASSIST IN INVESTIGATING AND RESOLVING DESIGN AND PRODUCTION ISSUES; REVIEW REVISION NOTICE (RN) DATA TO IDENTIFY TRENDS WITHIN ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES REGARDING DATA FLOW FROM LEAD YARD TO FOLLOW YARD; REVIEW LIAISON INQUIRY (LI) DATA TO IDENTIFY TRENDS AND PROBLEM AREAS TO SUPPORT TIMELY ANSWERS FROM BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION (BIW) AND THE NAVY TO QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE FOLLOW SHIPBUILDER. B. PERFORM COMPUTER ANALYSES OF SHIPBUILDER DESIGN, PRODUCTION, AND OTHER SCHEDULES TO PROVIDE THE NAVY AN INDEPTH ANALYSIS CAPABILITY. CREATE A PCBASED 3D DISPLAY SYSTEM/PROGRAM UTILIZING THE NEUTRAL FILES DEVELOPED BY BIW AND NGSS CONVERTED TO A FORM SUITABLE FOR USE ON A PC. PERFORM SPECIAL COMPUTER STUDIES TO ANALYZE PRODUCTION PERFORMANCES BY SHIPBUILDERS, PREDICT PROBLEM AREAS, AND DETERMINE PRODUCTION PROBLEM TRENDS; MAINTAIN DATABASE FOR GOVERNMENT PROVIDED DRAWING/DESIGN SCHEDULE INFORMATION. C. PROVIDE SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES TO THE AEGIS DESTROYER PROGRAM INCLUDING SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, DESIGN AND INTEGRATION SERVICES, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, SURVIVABILITY AND SECURITY SERVICES, AND DATA CONVERSION SERVICES. SPECIFIC TASKING IN EACH AREA SHALL INCLUDE: (1) EVALUATE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS ON DDG 51 CLASS. EVALUATE AEGIS COMBAT SYSTEM BASELINE CHANGES FOR POTENTIAL IMPACT TO ONBOARD SYSTEMS, SURVIVABILITY AND VULNERABILITY OF SYSTEMS FOR BACK UP AND RECOVERY SERVICES, DETERMINATION OF OPTIMUM RESOURCING BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER CHANGES ARE ADOPTED. (2) APPLY FLEET OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE TO CONDUCT ANALYSES. REPORT ON INSTALLED HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE CHANGES WITH RESPECT TO EFFECTIVENESS AND SUITABILITY. THIS WILL INCLUDE PARTICIPATION IN FLEET LIAISON MEETINGS INCLUDING THE COMBATANT FLEET ISSUES AND RESPONSE MEETINGS (CFIRM). (3) ANALYZE DISPERSED NODE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, SUCH AS DMS, FODMS, ISMS AND OTHER SYSTEMS AS DESIGNATED BY PEO SHIPS. PROVIDE EVALUATION OF NEW DESIGN AND INTEGRATION IMPLEMENTATIONS. (4) PROVIDE ASSISTANCE IN SYSTEMS’DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING AUTOMATED COMMON DIAGRAMS DEVELOPMENT, SPECIFICALLY TO PROVIDE PRACTICAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT EXPERIENCE. EMPHASIS SHALL BE PLACED ON OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE OF SYSTEMS CURRENTLY INSTALLED ONBOARD DDG 51 CLASS SHIPS. (5) PROVIDE EXPERIENCED FLEET PERSONNEL TO ADDRESS THE SYSTEM SECURITY AND SURVIVABILITY AT ALL ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS ON DDG 51 CLASS SHIPS. PROVIDE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM AN OPERATIONAL PERSPECTIVE TO APPLY TO NEW CONSTRUCTION DDG 51 CLASS SHIPS WITH EMPHASIS ON THE VULNERABILITY AND SURVIVABILITY OF SYSTEMS TO INCLUDE: DISASTER RECOVERY (INCLUDING BATTLE DAMAGE); CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS; AND CONTINGENCY PLANNING (CASUALTY MODES). SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID TO SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR VITAL COMBAT SYSTEMS. THIS MAY ALSO INCLUDE EVALUATION OF AWARENESS OF IT AND RELATED ISSUES TO INCLUDE BOTH SCHOOLHOUSE AND WATERFRONT FAMILIARIZATION. (6) PROVIDE ASSISTANCE IN HIGH SPEED SCANNING AND MANAGEMENT FOR BACKFILE CONVERSIONS AND CONCEPT SEARCH AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS. THIS SHALL ENCOMPASS ALL ACTIVITIES NECESSARY TO ANALYZE DATABASES AND DEPLOY INFORMATION SYSTEMS INCLUDING TECHNICAL COMPONENTS, ORGANIZATIONAL COMPONENTS AND DOCUMENTATION. D. PROVIDE PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LOGISTICS PLANNING AND DOCUMENTATION IN SUPPORT OF DDG 51 CLASS CORROSION CONTROL PROGRAMS TO INCLUDE: (1) PROVIDE TECHNICAL SUPPORT IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND EXECUTION OF CORROSION CONTROL PROGRAM PLANS INCLUDING THE CORROSION CONTROL IN PROCESS TEAM (CCIPT) AND THE IN-SERVICE SURVEYS. PROVIDE LIAISON WITH PMS 400F KEEPING THEM APPRAISED OF CORROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES APPLIED IN NEW CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR APPLICABILITY TO BACKFIT. ATTEND CORROSION CONTROL RELATED MEETINGS INCLUDING CFIRM, TMA/TMI, CTIC AND ERM TO REMAIN ABREAST OF CORROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES IN THE FIELD. (2) PROVIDE TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TO DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN THE CORROSION CONTROL WEB S $9,124,150
contract
American Systems Corporation 2010 YR 3 OMNIBUS SUPPORT $8,638,887
contract
American Systems Corporation 2000 $7,999,998
View all grant & loan data for American Systems Corp View all contract data for American Systems Corp Sources: USASpending.gov