Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson
Campaign Finance
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
For more information, please see our campaign finance methodology page. Lobbyist bundling data is described on our lobbyist bundling methodology page.
Latest FEC Data
covers through committee's December 31, 2012 filing.-
Summary
overview of the committee's finances- Total Raised:
- $127,410
- Total Spent:
- $112,470
- Cash on Hand:
- $26,222
- Debts:
- $0
Standardized Donation Information
covers roughly through Q4 2012. may lag behind FEC section above, as donors and industries are identified by hand.-
Top Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
-
Republicans vs. Democrats
in dollars. "Other" includes 3rd parties and organizations without official party affiliation. -
State vs. Federal
in dollars -
Top PAC Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
Lobbying
$5,355,000 IncomeFigures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying Carried Out by Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson
-
Names of Lobbyists
-
Client Amount InterContinental Hotels Group $540,000 American Assn of Cosmetology Schools $360,000 Nye County, NV $270,000 San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority $270,000 Miami-Dade County, FL $210,000 Shinnecock Indian Nation $200,000 Corinthian Colleges $180,000 VITAS Healthcare $160,000 Natl Assn of Disability Representatives $160,000 Coachella Valley Water District $160,000 -
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Fed Budget & Appropriations,
- Indian/Native American Affairs,
- Education,
- Health Issues,
- Clean Air & Water,
- Government Issues,
- Gaming, Gambling & Casinos,
- Trade,
- Transportation,
- Immigration
-
Most Frequently Disclosed Bills
Bill No. Title S.460 Education for All Act of 2011 H.R.2117 Protecting Academic Freedom in Higher Education Act S.1599 Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012 H.R.2055 Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012 H.R.1 Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 H.R.1837 San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act H.R.1560 To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that tribe. H.R.1234 To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes. H.R.1291 To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes, and for other purposes. H.R.4057 Improving Transparency of Education Opportunities for Veterans Act of 2012
Regulations
All data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.